STUTZ Enterprises Parent Company

11/06/2016

11/06/2016

07/14/2016

"Spread The Word" {I Scott Canonica } Will Be Drafting Petitions and Legislation Act's. For Whistle Blower Protection Laws and Legislation in the State of Washington} I will be drafting Them as soon as I threw with currant business associated to Triangle Recreational Campground and Undue Enrichment by a Not-For-Profit Organization operating in the State of Washington Under the Consumer Protection Act. and Address Prudery Charges Of Snohomish County Court Documents By Said Defendants in a civil action as well as Prudery in Documents associated to land development and usage, Intentional deception by a not-for-profit to obtain land leases, County violations, Public Safety and or sales purchase's, or operating functions, Trafficking of US FUNDS across US and Canadian Borders as a start and limited liability regarding obtaining of personal property owned by plaintiff Scott Canonica and intentional interferences of personal property sale "THE 500 RIVERWOOD CABIN" on Triangle Recreational Camp Property in Granite falls Washington. In addition possible statements and or Warnings by A Member and a Business manager to prevent. "Default judgment and or summery judgment". in addition State of Washington Bar Complaint and grievance currently being filled out by ex-plaintiff Scott Canonica. As well as other action Plaintiff Scott Canonica would file and take as an unsatisfactory result from undue trauma due to the organization actions. consider this an official document that will be copied and pasted into court and legal documents soon. by Scott Canonica Or by My Special Executive Company Power of Attorney, Employee or volunteer of STUTZ Enterprises of Puyallup Washington 98371-6491 Stutz Pi**ed Stutz Canonicas Preston S. Canonica STUTZ ENTERPRISES Parent Company or any Volunteer Division Head.

07/14/2016

Public service announcement : {Take Notice of Disclaimers on all STUTZ Enterprises Documentary raw Movie footage Videos}
https://youtu.be/O77aVSh5_Xo?t=3 https://youtu.be/dBhnpqnclKI?t=3 https://youtu.be/mH7k9bWqj-k?t=3 https://youtu.be/mH7k9bWqj-k?t=110 Filming permits where discussed at the Washington State Governor's office in Olympia, I was never granted a permit to film any raw footage in any state or county for this documentary of my life and PTSD Research on Coping Machinimas to recover from Traumatic life events.. WRITING IS ONE.. these are other ways to be fully explained at a latter date. by STUTZ Enterprises founder Scott A. Canonica
















STUTZ ENTERPRISE RACING DIVISION DEMONSTRATION VIDEO. All standard Stutz disclaimers apply.

This video was shot in a controlled environment with…



youtube.com

This video was shot in a controlled environment with varying road conditions and is a demonstration of Stutz Enterprises racing divisions drivers abilities. ...

07/11/2016

Let's talk tomorrow.
Thank you for your kind thoughts.
Feb 10th, 7:42am
Craig you lied in your document to Snohomish County "I have all the evidence" and can prove everything TRC and TRC members did to me and my service dog that you where made aware that was a service dog registered on internet. you knew that in 2013, I have been to county reviewed the both big file folders that you tried to hide what was inside, the fact that TRC planed to have MOVABLE structure placed on concrete blocks shows what the intent was when Chris Ellis signed that document. I saw the damage that has taken place with my cabin I have filed a report with Sheriff and I have filed another complain with the county and they where going to get someone right up there to take a look. in TRC meeting minutes there is much evidence to dispute all you actions.. as promised on facebook under my company page you will notice that I plan to expose your organization YOU WILL BE THE FIRST TO GO TO JAIL . CHRIS ELLIS WILL BE SECOND FOR THE CHARGES I PLAN TO FILE AGAINST HER. THEN THERE ARE THE cyber crimes like the violation of FACEBOOK policies and so much more I don't have time to deal with you my call list contain calls to the governor's office ABC news Fox News, King5 news, KOMO news, and others including the Washington state health department, washington state liquor control board, You may not know this but a handful of TRC members that don't want to loose everything they have invested at TRC have supplied me with this information. NOW ITS TIME TO SETTLE THIS LAW SUITE. if you think I'm Bluffing I'm not JULY 2014 discussion of the way TRC was going to obtain my cabin where disused Payment price was discussed., just as much as the conversations TRC members took part of and action that you all where going to take after the disclosures about the complain I filed in 2013 with Snohomish county. and there is the Membership document that everyone had to resign that was the revise membership form to include the clause you stated in you declaration to snohomish county. This means that everything in this case goes off that FIRST FORM I SIGNED WHEN I JOINED, I have a mountain of evidence against TRC . indemnifying your members isn't going to get you out of this one I have Ron Mallard on camera vandalizing my waterfall at STUTZ ENTERPRISES Parent Company Location ,. I have all the video files from that location to file stalking charges as well.. all my neighbors will testify as well when we take this to court and close TRC and EXPOSE your Profiting not for profit. and use all your documents.. and just to let you all know I have met to Howard Knight and all the county officials you deal with and I mean Every single one of the from the bottom of the chain right up to the top. CLOSING YOUR LONG STANDING BANK ACCOUNT IS THE BIGGEST RED FLAG OF ALL. MY POSTS ON FACEBOOK WILL START VARY SOON USING DOCUMENTS FROM YOUR ORGANIZATION AFTER THOSE POST ARE MADE IS WHEN THE NEWS CONFERENCE WILL BE HELD THIS IS YOU LAST CHANCE GET YOUR "TRC" ATTORNEY TO MAKE CONTACT IMMEDIATELY WITH MY ATTORNEY CHRIS MARSTON AT DAVIES PEARSON , { THIS GAME IS OVER } trc DID THEES THING INTENTIONALLY AND WITH MALLAS . not getting to of this mess for you and TRC
Mar 28th, 10:23am
TIMES UP....Craig Maynard president of triangle recreational Campground Please be aware Scott Allen canonica known as Preston to you has been to channel 4 news on Friday regarding the practices of your organization the pending lawsuit the product line that my company cannot produce because of the situation your organization has put that company in financially the financial responsibilities the canonical team has had to take on, and a special note when you personally are not allowed to travel into the state of Washington or the United States because you perjured yourself in court documents submitted to Snohomish County despite your organization having meeting minutes recorded that reflect a completely opposite interest in my personal property on your site... Your attorney fails to get back to my attorney upon your organization's request .....Jack Stahl Warren you all and warned you and warned you on the off season not to screw with me, and to settle this... Now you're going to see everything in the news media and that's EXACTLY where triangle recreational Campground will be tried FIRST Even before I get you into a courtroom... AND Ya'll have a Nice Day Scott Canonica I gave you all the chances in the world to do the right thing.. 40 years of operation and this is how you handle business . People of the STATE of WASHINGTON are going to weigh in pretty heavy on your Organization... YOU WERE WARNED NUMEROUS TIMES...... YOU HAVE BROUGHT THIS ON YOURSELVES WITH YOUR SELF DESTRUCTIVE WAYS.!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Now pass this to your BOD and your Attorney.. But it's still to late for you all The Calls have already been made to all News Agencies...,.
FILES COPY AND PASTED
Triangle Recreation Camp.
FILE NO: '9710161S
TYPE OF REQUEST: Rezone from Forestry (F) to Forestry and Recreation (F&R), und a Conditional Use Permit (CUP) for a campground
DECISION Conditions
BASIC INFORMATION
GENERAL LOCATION: propeHy is 300 feet east Of mine (landmark). approximately One mile west ofSilverton on the Mountain Highway.ACRFÄAGE: 39.4 acres:
ZONING: Forestry (F)
PROPOSED: Forestry Recreation (F&R)
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN DÉSIGNATtÖN:
Forest
UTILITIES;
éc1100L DISTRICT:
FIREDJSTRICT:

SELECTED AGENCY RECOMMENDATIONS:
Department of:
Planning and Development Services: Approval subject to preconditions and conditions
Public Works: Approval subject to preconditions and conditions
INTRODUCTION
The applicant filed the Master Application on February 6, 1997. (Exhibit I)
ne Hearing Examiner (Examiner) has a fam iliarity with the area and has driven by the general area in the past; and did drive toward this general area on January 2, 2004, however, there was much snow and ice on the road to proceed all the way to the site
The Department of Planning and Development Services (PDS) gave proper public notice ofthe open ræord hearing required by the County code. (Exhibits 17, 8 and 19)
A SEPA determination Was made November 17, 2003. (Exhibit 16) NO appeal Was filed.
The Examiner held an OFn record hearing on January 7, 2004. this exceeded the 120-day decision making period. Witnesses were sworn, testimony was presented, and exhibits were entered at the hearing.
PUBLIC HEARING
•ne public hearing commenced on January 7, 2004 at 10;00 a.m.
Examiner indicated that he read the PDS Staff report, reviewed the file and the area and therefore has a general idea Of the particular request involved.
Mr. Kevin Nelson, the project coordinator for the applicant, appeared and stated the Site had purchased in 1996, He stated that there are semi-permanent camping sites on the property as well as temporary ones. HC indicated that there would bc substantial visual buffering with the existing trees and the members will kccp up the camp sites. He steted thc south sidc of this property is designated Native Groulh Protection Area (NGPA) along the river and concluded by stating that he agrees with the PDS staff conditions.
Mr Knight, POS, and Stated that they have the right to administratively issue a Shoreline Permit they do in case. He Stated this is they do not want public access into the NGF' A. He Stated that there Will bc some Changes to the parking, which Can not be seen at from the road. He indicated that vesting On the fees Wad occurred prior the existing law. However, he wanted some timc left open make any changes.
No one appeared in opposition to the request.
rhe hearing concluded at 10:22
NOTE: Audio ofthis hearing are available in the Office ofthe Hearing Examiner.
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND DECISION
CLNDINGS:
The master list of Exhibits and Witnesses which is a part ofthis filc and which exhibits were by the Examiner, is hereby made a part ofthis file, as if set forth in full herein.
The PDS staff report has correctly analyzed nature of the application, the issues of concern, the application's consistency with adopted codes and policies and land use regulations, and the State Environmental Protection Act (SEPA) evaluation with its recommendation and conditions. This repul is hereby adopted by the Examiner ss if Set forth in full herein.
The request is for a CUP for a private campground and a Rezone from F to F&R. The campground is divided by the Mountain Loop Highway into two distinct areas With the lower (southern) arca in the jurisdiction of the South Fork Stillaguamish River and the upper (northern) area being across the Mountain Loop Highway with this campground area predominantly 00tside of shoreline jurisdiction and less critical area constraints and is heavily buffered by trees.
This parcel, parcels to the east, and the parcel to the north form an enclave of County jurisdiction with the surrounding properties under the jurisdiction of the United States Forest SeNice. Adjacent zoning is F, with land uses being a cabin to the east and a conditional use for mineral excavation and processing to the north,
No one appeared in opposition to the request and onc letter uas received in support of the request. (Exhibit 21)
southem portion Of the sitc lies Within the floodplain Of the South Fork Stillaguami5h River and has all designated NGPA_ There are two wetlands, onc is a Category 3 and one is a Category 2 '.vetla_nd, a Type 3/4 stream, and Critical Which have all bccn identified in the northern portion Of Site. request has been reviewed and IS accordance With SCC 30.62 32.10 SCC) Critical Area R ti ons.
The proposal is not subject to park mitigation requirernents (Chapter 30.66A SCC), nor the school mitigations requirements (SCC 30.660.
The DPW reviewed the request with regard to trdfic mitigation and road design standards. nis review covered Title SCC and Chapter 30.66B SCC (Title 26B SCC) as to road system capacity, concurrency, inadequate road conditions, frontage improvements, ao:ess and circulation, and dedication/deeding of right-or-way, state highway impacts, impacts on Other streets and roads, and Transportation Demand Management, As a result Of this the DPW has determined that the development is Concurrent and has no objection to the requests subject to various conditions. (See Pages 3-4, Exhibit 34)
The PDS Engineering Division has reviewed the concept of the proposed grading and drainage and recommends Of the project subject to conditions, which would be imposed during full detailed drainage oursuant to Chapter SCC (Title 24 SCC),

I ne property 's not located within Urban Growth Area (LIGA) but rather is designated National Forest or the General Policy Plan (GPP) Future Land Use Map (FLUM). ne rezone, to allow for recreational purposes, is consistent with the mning ccySe (Title g SCC), and is also consistent with the objectives and policies for forcst lands presented in the CPP.
10. Conditional uses arc evaluated pursuant to SCC 18.72.060 and in this regard, the PDS staff evaluated the requirements of a CUP on Page 5 of Exhibit 34 and finds that the proposal is compatible; andthat there are no serious advcrse affects. The use will maintain the existing character of forestry use with a recreational element, which is consistent with that use.
NO adverse affects occur to land uses in the area as a result Of this request.
12. Any Finding of Fact in this Report and Decision, which should bc deemed a Conclusion. is hereby ad Opted as such.
ne Examiner having fully reviewed the PDS staff report, hereby adopts said staff report as properly setting forth the issues, the land use requests, consistency with the existing regulations, policies, principles, conditions and their effect upon the request. It is therefore hereby adopted by the Examiner as a conclusion as if sct forth in full herein, in order to avoid needless repetition. There areno changes to the recommendations of the staff report.
Department Of Public Works recommends that the request be approved as to subject to certain conditions.
lie request is consistent with the GMACP; GMA•based County codes; and the type and character of land use permitted on the site and thc permitted density with the applicable design and development standards.
request for the Of this FM-operty for recreational uses Which are consistent with the general uses in the area of forestry and mining, meets all Of the requirements Of the GMA and the land use codes.
request be approved subject to compliance by the applicant With the and Conditions:
PRECONDITIONS
A record of the developer's Chapter 30.66B SCC mitigation obligations and eerlific•ate of concurrency shall have been recorded with the County Auditor against the real property on which the development is propos-cd.
2) ne sum of $3,660.00 shall have been paid to Snohomish County tmva:d the fund for project imoacts to road canacitv within Transoortation Service Am "R"

I) Exhibit ISA shall the offcial site development plan(s) for the revision; any discrepane) between the content of the official sitc development plan(s) and the performance standards 01 Title 30 SCC shall resolved in favor of the standards contained within Title 30 SCC. Revisior of official site development plans is regulated by SCC 30.42C. I O.
Ihe total nurr&r of campsites the subject property shall not exceed 100 _ restrictions apply to the lower campground area located south Of the
The number Of campsites not exceed eleven ( I I ) With one fire pit per Site, The tent site numbers and Iccations allowed within each campsite are limited per the approved site plan.
b) Camping is restricted to the Spring and Summer season from April 1st through September Activities related to the closing of the campground are allmved through the month of October.
e) ne parking area located south of the Mountain Loop Highway will only be utilized for drop off and pick up only. No ovcmight parking is allowed.
Prior to issuance of the grading perm it;
a) Native Growth Ara shall be Frmancntly marked on the site, as described the Revised September 4, 2003 Wetland Mitigation Plan by Wetland Resources, Inc.
b) All critical areas and their required Shall be designated Native Growth
Areas. A Critical Area Site Plan (CASP) shall be recorded with the Snohomish County Auditor based on the boundaries revuesented on the September 18.2003 Conditional Use permit Site 4, 2003 Wetland Mitigation by Wetland Resources, Inc. The following restrictive language shall be placed on the CASP:
NATIVE GROWTH PROTECTION AREA is to be left permanently undist'Æbed in a substantially natural state. No clearing, grading, building construction or or road constnaction of any kind shall removal Of us
Prior to any cccupancy permit or final inspection of the grading permit:
a)aprons Shall have been installed at both property entrances onto Mountain LOOP Highway.
All trail and imprm•cments within the Mountain Highway right-Ofway ±signed and Constructed to the requirements Of the Department Of pub lie Works.
c) new access to the portion of due campground on the south side of Mountain Loop Highway shall ha•.e Seen constructed and the existing southern access permanently

September 2003 Wetland Mitigation Plan by Wetland Resources, Inc. shall be satisfactorily implemented prior to final grading permit approval.
The recipient Of any conditional use permit Shall file a land use permit binder on a form provided hy the department and Development With the County prior to any Oi the following: initiation of any further site work, issuance of any developmcnÜconstruction permits by the County, or occupancy/use Of the subject property buildings thereon for the usc activity authorized. binder Shall serve both as acknowledgement of and agreement to abide by the and conditions of the conditional use permit and as a notice to prospective purchasers ofthe existcnce ofthe permit. (SCC 30.42C.200)
Any Conclusion in this Report and Decision, which should be deemed a Finding of Fact, is hereby adopted as such.
DECISION
The requests for a Rezone frmn Forestry to Forestry Recreatioa, and for a Use permit are hereby APPROVED, SUBJECT TO COMPLIANCE by the with the PRECONDITIONS and CONDITIONS set forth in Conclusion 5,
Decision issued this 21st day of January, 2004.

Robert J. Backstein, Hearing Examiner
EXPLANAnON OF RECONSIDERATION AND APPEAL PROCEDURES
Decision of the Hearing Examiner is final and conclusive with right of appeal to the County Council. However, reconsideration by the Examiner may also be sought by one or more Parties of Record. ne following paragraphs summarize the reB3nsideration and appeal processes. For more infomtation about reconsideration and appeal procedures, please see Chapter 30.72 SCC and the respective Examiner and Cöuncil Rules af Procedure.
n Sid on
Any Party of Record may request reconsideration by the Examiner. A petition for Reconsideration must be filed in writing with the Office of the Hearing Examiner, 2802 Wetmore Avenue, 2nd Floor, Everett, Washingtcn, (Muiiing Address: M/S *405, Evcrctt WA 98201) on or FEBRUARY 2 ntere is no fee for filing a Pctition far Rcconsideration. • Othe petitioner for reconsideration shall mail or otherwise provide a Copy of the petition for reconsideration to al' parties of record on the d*te of filing." Petition for Reconsideration does not have to be in a but must: contain tne name,
Ind daylime telephone number of the petitioner, together with the signature of the petitioner or ofthe petitioner's if any; identify the specific findings, conclusions, actions and/or conditions for which reconsideration is requested; State the relief requested; and, where applicable, identify the specific nature of any newly discovered evidence and/or changes proposed by the applicant, ne grounds for seeking reconsideration are limited to the following; ne Hearing Examiner exceeded the Hearing Examiner's jurisdictiom
(b) lie Hearing Examiner failed to follow the applicable procedure in reaching the Hearing Examiner's decision; ne Hearing Examiner committed an error of law;
(d) The Hearing Examiner's findings, conclusions and/or conditions are not supported by the record;
New evidence which could not reasonably have been and which is material to the decision is discovered; or
The applicant proposed Changes to application in response to deficiencies identified in the decision.
Petitions for Reconsideration Will processed and considered by the Hearing Examiner pursuant to the provisions Of SCC 3 0.72,065. p [ease include the County number in any correspondence case.
An appeal to the County Council may be filed by any aggrieved Party of Record. Where the reconsideration process Of SCC has been invoked, no appeal may be filed until the reconsideraticm petition has been disposed Of by the hearing examiner. An party need not file a Petition for Reconsideration but may file an appeal directly to the Ccnnity Council. If a Petition for Reconsideration is filed, issues subsequently raised by that party appeal to the County Council shall be limited to those issues raised in the Petition for
Appeals shall addressed to the Snohomish County Council hut shall be filed in writing with the Department cf Planning and Development Services, 5th Floor, County Administration Building. 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett, Washington (Mailing address: WS #604, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, Everett, WA 98201) on or before FEBRUARY 4 2004 and shall be accompanied by a filing fce in the amount of five hundred dollars ($500.00); PROVIDED, that the filing fee shall not bc charged to a department of the County or to other than the first appellant; and PROVIDED FURTHER, that the filing fee shall be æfundcd in any case where an appeal is dismissed without hearing because of untimely filing, lack Of standing, lackof jurisdiction or other procedural defect. [SCC 30.721070)
An appeal must contain the follCAVing in order to be complete: a detailed statement of the grounds fOJ appeal; a Statement Of upon wh'Ch appeal is based, including citations to specific
Extnniner Findings, Conclusions, exhibits or oral testimony; written arguments in support of the appeal: the name mailing address and dayime telephone number of caeh appellant, together with the signature of at letst one ofthc appellants or ofthe attorney for the appellant(s), if any; the name, mailing address, daytime telephone number ane signature Of the appellmit's agent Or representative, if any; and the required filing fee.

rhe grounds for tiling an apgwal shall be I imited to the following:
decision the Hearing Examiner' S
(b) fie Hearing Examiner failed to follmv the applicable procedure in reaching his decision;
(c) ne Hearing Examiner committed an error of law; or
(d) ne Hearing Examiner's findings, conclusions and/or conditions arc not supported by substantiai in the record- [SCC 30.72,080]
fie following statement is provided pursuant to RCW 36.70B "Affected property may request a change in valu2tion for property tax purposes notwithstanding any program Of revaluation." A copy Of this Decision is being provided to the County Assessor as required by RCW 36.70B.130_
Appeals will prcxesscd and considered by the County Council pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 30.72
The Land Use Permit Binder, which must bc executed and as required by SCC 30.42C.200, •will be provided by the department. The Binder bc recorded until all reconsideration and/or appeal proceedings have been concluded and the permit has t*come effective.

This decision is binding but Will not become effective until the above precondition(s) have been tilltilled and acknowledged by the Department Of Planning and Development Services on the original Of the instant decision. Document(s) required for fulfillment of the precondition(s) must be filed in a complete, executed fashion with PDS not later than
"Fulfillment" as used herein means recordation with the County Auditor, approvaVacceptance by the County Council ancVor Hearing Examiner, and/or such other final action as is appropriate to the particular precondition(s).
One and only one six month period will tR allowed for resubmittal of any required document(s) which (are) returned to the applicant for correction.
•nig conditional approval will automatically be null and void ifall required precondition(s) have not fulfilled as set forth above; PROVIDED, that:
A. ne Examiner may grant a one-time extension of the submittal deadline for not more than twelve (12) months for just cause if and only if a written extension is received by the prior to the expiration of the original time FÆriOd; and
ACKNOWLEDGMENT OF FULFILLMENT OF PRECONDITIONS
The above imposed precondition(s) having been fulfilled by the applicant and/or the successors in intercsl, the Department Of Planning and Development Services hereby states that the instant with official Site plan is effective as of
(Name)
(Title)

EC CAMP INC

97 101673 TRIANGLE RECCA.MP
HRG: 1/7,04 97101673.DOC(CF) UPDATED 1-20-0401K)
SNO HEALTH DIST
IS J MULLEN.'B R.AASINA
3020 RUCKER AVE
SUITE 104
EVERETT WA 98201-3900
DEPT OF PLAN & DEVEL SVCS
HOWARD KNIGHT
3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE
EVERETT WA 98201
NA ST DEPT OF TRANSPORTATION IN PAZOOKI
PO BOX 330310
99 S SUITE 2220
EVERETT WA 38204 SEATTLE WA 98101-3207
STILLAGUAMtsg TRIBE SNO CO PUD
EDWARD L GOODRIDGE SR MARY BOND
PO SOX 277 PO Sox 1107
ARLINGTc* WA 98223-0277 EVERETT WA
STATE OF WA DEPT OF FISH AND QUILCEOA GROUP IN
WLDLIFE KATIE SINNER
DAMO BROCK HOYT AVE
MILL CREEK BLVD WA 98201
SEATTLE WA 98133-2710
DENNIS AND DIANE BOYD
48911 MT LOOP HV.Y
ANDREW SMITH soa NALEXEVIN NELSON
3000 ROCKEFELLER AVE
WA *201 '122 E ST SUITE
SEATTLE WA *122
WESTERN SURVEYORS INC
TERI QUA LY
WLLCREEKWA 98012-1296

Triangle Recreation Camp Established 1975

TRC Board Meeting August 17th, 2013

Board Meeting called to order at 12:01 pm
Present: Alexander K., Allan H., Bob N., Brandon W., Chris E., Chris F., Craig
M., Craig W., Dana W., Dean C., Doug S., Garrett C., Harvey H.,., Kelly C., Larry C., Mary S., Norman O., Preston C., Qevin S., Rick P., Ron M., Ross T., Tye P., Ted S.
Absent: Jack S. (E),

Minutes of August 2013

Motion Approve August 2013 Minutes
Chris F., 2nd: Kelly - Pro: 13 Con: 0 Abstain: 3 Passed

Committees:
Executive:
Final report into allegations of wrongdoing on the part of the VPD and VPO in regard to work done in the Eastern Expansion and Lower Lower development areas was presented.
• Committee Members were: Craig M. (Chair), Craig W. and Garrett C.
• The Committee reviewed much documentation in the report preparation (emails, financial records etc)
• Final Report was issued to the VPD, VPO. BOD and posted on the trcbod FB page.
• Craig M. reviewed the report explaining and answering questions as they arose.
• Recommendations:
o No action to be taken against the VPD or VPO
o Review of Bylaws to eliminate conflicts in financial authorities outlined for various Officers and Committees.

Motion Part I – To accept the Report “For Filing Purposes”:
Bob, 2nd: Qevin Pro: 20 Opposed: 0 Abstain: 3 Passed

Re: ‘Conclusion’: It was noted that failure to obtain a proper permit in advance resulted in double the fee.
Motion Part II – To accept the Conclusion amended to include the following phrase at the end: “… because Anderson did not have either insurance or contractor licence”:
Chris E., 2nd: Qevin Pro: 17 Opposed: 1 Abstain: 4 Passed

Motion Part III – Confirm the Recommendation that no action be taken against the VPD or VPO
Qevin, 2nd: Ross Pro: 13 Opposed: 5 Abstain: 4 Passed Operations:
• Campground will close Sunday October 13th
• Garbage bins and porta potties removed the following week
• Internet removed weekend of the 12th and not available during the week until then.

Development:
• A few permits on hand to review
• Repairs on Water Tank (Dent on top from snow load) o Can be ‘popped’ into place o Need structure to protect over the winter
• Water System o Letter received from Engineers to survey site and make recommendations
o Retainer: $500 + $150/hr
o Will circulate letter to BOD for review

Marketing:
Thank you to all the volunteers that made the Mardi Gras weekend a success!
• Craig M. gave an itemized breakdown of the weekend attendance figures.
After expenses, net income was approximately $6500
• Year to date approximate net income: o Memorial Day $1000 o White Towel $2500 o Black Forest $2900 o Underwear/Foam $5700
• Craig M. noted that early registration and payment of fees for the Vancouver Pride events can save up to 50%.

Treasurer:
Thank you to all members who generated a buzz in the community at large to come visit the campground.
Profit and Loss statements circulated and reviewed
Balance Sheet circulated and reviewed

Motion Approve Treasurer’s Reports
Dana, 2nd Brandon - Pro: 18 Con: 0 Abstain: 2 Passed

Overwinter Fee
Craig W. recommended setting this fee at $80

Motion That we approve $80 Overwinter Fee
Craig W., 2nd: Brandon Pro: 11 Opposed: 3 Abstain: 5 Passed


Electric Company data report:
• Ross outlined the project activities from Memorial Day to Labor Day. Based on donations received from 17 campsites that were able to be served by our limited equipment there was a net return of $675 over expenses incurred. (including mid week service during busy months and extended hours during event weekends
• Equipment currently on site is on loan as must be purchased or returned.

Motion To Table plans to expand the electrical system.
Doug S.., 2nd: Dana Pro: 12 Opposed: 0 Abstain: 6 Passed

Facebook Usage Policy
Doug S. presented a proposed usage policy document covering our two FB pages (a ‘Secret’ one for BOD/TRC business and a public one for friends and customers) as requested in previous meeting.

Motion To accept the Facebook Usage Policy .
Qevin, 2nd: Brandon Pro: 18 Opposed: 0 Abstain: 1 Passed

Overwinter Security
• There will be 3 cameras in place. Images will be reviewed by Ron and Qevin.
• Have larger memory cards this year
• Signs will be posted as last year

Winter Camping
A Committee was formed (Bob N. Chair) to recommend guidelines around use of the campgrounds over the winter months. They are to produce a report at the next BOD meeting.

Announcement
Bob passed on Don and Doreen Bergstrom’s thanks for personal donations made by TRC members. Will ‘Pass the Hat’ at the AGM later.

Nominations Committee:
Last Call For Ballots

Recess
Meeting recessed at 2:45 to reconvene at 6:30 for the AGM


Annual General Meeting 2013

Meeting resumed at 6:30 after a sumptuous Pot Luck Dinner

TRC Secretary, Garrett thanked the Nominations Committee members (Ron M., Bob N., Mary S., Harvey H., Norm O., and Doug A) for their work in conducting the election process this year.

The Secretary certified and announced the results:

Bylaw Amendment: Passed

2014 Board Members:
Simon
Jeff
Kelly
Garrett
Preston
Dean
Larry
Brian
Derek
Chris
Harvey
Chris
Ron Andrew
Bachman
Campagne
Campbell
Canonica
Carey
Clark
DeLeon
Downey
Frickland
Hoffman
Kauffman
Mallard Bob
Norman
Rick
Will
Qevin
Jack
Ted
Ross
Brandon
Greg
Dana
Don
Nale
Ose
Petro
Robinson
Smith
Stahl
Stanczak
Tremblay
Walker
Warnick
Williams
Young
2014 Executives:
President: Craig Maynard
VP Operations: Allan Hallson
VP Development: Chris Ellis
VP Marketing: Doug Sharp
TRC Secretary: Mary Shearman
TRC Treasurer:

Awards:
Craig Wunder
Mike Trojan was presented with a certificate in honor of being the 1,000th member of our TRC (Public) page

Garrett Campbell was presented with a retirement gift (a lovely high heel tape dispenser!)

Doug Sharp was presented with The Golden Bungee Award

Submitted by Garrett C.,
TRC Secretary
Thanks Garrett- definitely 'can of worms-y' BUT I feel like I can address the original question/statement:

Sink or swim- we'll figure it out when we get there- announce away Craig!

Mary

----- Original Message -----
From: "Garrett"
To: "Mary Shearman"
Cc: "dugsharp" , "Craig Maynard" , "Craig Wunder" , "Allan Hallsson" , "Chris Ellis"
Sent: Sunday, November 3, 2013 2:17:35 PM
Subject: Re: Committee appointment – bylaws and rules


Hi all,


Here I go...




* a) I'm happy to help Mary out in any way I can
* b) Committee Membership: There is a school of thought among some BODs that it is their god given right to inflict themselves on any Committee they choose, regardless of any skills they may have for the topic at hand. Over the years some have been quick to sign up only if there is some 'issue' that may affect them personally (self serving!), then have no real contribution to make other than to shoot down any ideas that limit what they see as their "Rights".


* Personally, I'm of the opinion that fewer members actually interested in working on a project works better than a 'free for all'.
* The latest (2013) mailing list includes: Brandon, Lawrence, Chris K, Mary and Me. Last year, even though we didn't do a whole lot, we had NO input from Brandon at all and minimal from Lawrence. (although he's a pretty good historical resource). In prior years, Ron and Dana likewise had little or no constructive input.
* Chris K would be an awesome resource for the Committee. I don't know enough about Don Y to get a feel for his abilities - although he seemed to ask and offer thoughtful questions and comments at Board Meetings he's attended.
*
c) Scope of Work: I think it was Chris K that suggested a complete re-work of the Bylaws. This MIGHT be a good idea, but will have to be carefully done so the entire Board can understand the new content and the reasons the Committee recommends the change.

* It would also have to be clear enough to the Membership at large so they can ratify any changes next August/September
*
d) Committee Chair and members: Since the Secretary is responsible for keeping and publishing all the official records, it makes sense to me that the Secretary should be Chair.

* Since only the President is authorized to appoint BODs (as Bob is so fond of pointing out) perhaps Mary could think about the candidates she wants and have Craig M do the appointing, rather than asking broadly 'who wants to play'! Too many cooks can definitely get in the way and let's face it, there are some 'volunteers' that would be counter productive to include - some with self serving interests and others that would just bog the process down with minutia.
* Committee name: I would recommend against calling this the "Rules Committee". I was delighted some years ago when we landed on "Governance" as the name - since it covers it all: Bylaws, Rules, Conditions of Occupancy and Policies. I'm continually shocked that some Board members (who shall remain nameless.... Bob!) are unclear of the difference and where each is in the hierarchy of 'Authority'.

Anyway... there's my 2¢. Need to get together with Mary real soon to go over the Secretarial processes already in place.






~ Garrett







On Sun, Nov 3, 2013 at 12:43 PM, Mary Shearman < [email protected] > wrote:


This is indeed a great off-season project- that I'm super excited to get started on... a few things conflict below/don't address my understanding of a few things, so I just want to make sure that i's are crossed and t's are dotted (that's intentional...) before we get to work, as I see it, that will make the ultimate revisions smoother- may be cut some time down in the passing process (hey, a girl can dream...)... (I've added Garrett to the CC line- we haven't had our 'tutorial' session yet, and my understanding is that the secretary is the default rules/governance committee chair- so he may have some input in all this, and more!?)

This is a little chicken/egg but, do committees automatically 'reset' on November 1rst? If there is an existing 'rule' that says that great- if not, I think the other hangers-on for the rules committee need to be included on the ground floor in anticipation of debunking later conspiracy theories (just trying to think like a paranoid person...there are a couple...)- these people (already on the committee, not necessarily paranoid...) include Ross T., Ron M., Dana W., and probably a few others- Derek D., may be... (Garrett, who are they?)- I've been on the rules committee for a few years, and anyone reading who may, for whatever reason, be having some kind of reaction to any/all of those names- as a committee member when the code of ethics was being drafted (which let's face it was/is contentious...) this was no headache at all, John Sigala and I did most of the drafting, Garrett as chair came in periodically and that was about it (from my positioning, Garrett may have had a different experience...). Ross worked on possibilities for the 48 hour rule which was clearly where his interest lay on those particular off-season projects...and Ron and Dana and anyone else functioned as silent partners.

An alternative 'solution' would be to name the committee something else- but I'm really not into those games- I'm a firm believer in transparency at this point (ah, the innocence of youth...).

So, my understanding is that membership on standing committees is volunteer as opposed to appointed? So, I think, at least, the existing rules committee members need to be asked (which I am willing to do) unless 'someone' is prepared to say 'actually, we didn't want you here because your participation in the past has been minimal' (which at this point I don't have the balls for- transparency). Which then begs the question- if committee participation is volunteer- does it need to be opened further? I'm prepared for that sh*t-show... I think the larger the committee the harder to manage, absolutely, but in the same breath my plan, which I've already talked about with Chris K., is to ask committee members to form smaller groups/pairs tackle sections by a deadline report back to the larger group- some of these groups won't get anything done and the dedicated folks will cover that- all factored into the plan... Of course, that process needs to be agreed on by the committee and may be someone has better ideas?

So I'll cap my train of thought here for now, but head's up there may be some back and forth unless someone knows something hard and fast to shut me up (which I SO welcome!...Garrett....?)- responses either playing into my delusions or shutting them down? I'm open to it all!

Mary


----- Original Message -----
From: "dugsharp" < [email protected] >
To: "Craig Maynard" < [email protected] >, "Craig Wunder" < [email protected] >, "Allan Hallsson" < [email protected] >, "Mary Shearman" < [email protected] >, "Chris Ellis" < [email protected] >
Sent: Friday, November 1, 2013 7:25:17 PM
Subject: RE: Committee appointment – bylaws and rules


This is a great off-season project.









Sent from Samsung tablet


-------- Original message --------
From Craig Maynard < [email protected] >
Date: 11/01/2013 1:59 PM (GMT-08:00)
To Craig Wunder < [email protected] >,Allan Hallsson < [email protected] >,Mary Shearman < [email protected] >,Chris Ellis < [email protected] >,Doug Sharp < [email protected] >
Subject Committee appointment – bylaws and rules


Hi folks.

As was briefly discussed at the October board meeting, Chris Kauffman is offering up his talents for bylaws and rules wording-change recommendations. As such, I have spoken to Garrett, Mary and Don Young about being part of this committee. They have all agreed to be members.

As such, I would like to announce on the TRC Board of Directors page the formation of this committee, subject to any comments/suggestions you folks have. Can you let me know if I've missed something or am moving too quickly on this.

Regards
Craig

Sent from my iPad


THANKS TO THE Washington State Patrole SPEEDY Made sure that all law inforcement new what was ging on. Thank WSP for disregarding of lane of travel and Letting SPEEDY Travel at 100 mile an hour to get home to phone the FBI.. Your Speedys Best Buddies.. he says it all the time. All My Love to Troupy'S Buddies.
where waiting for all your Story lines, we know they will be fantastic.
Thanks: STUTZ Founder S. Canonica





Like · Reply · April 8 at 6:57pm
[email protected] wrote:
Thanks for your well expressed response Garrett,

My thoughts are:

1) Security monitoring can be accomplished by the use of the wild life cameras and day visits. No need for overnight monitoring. (except for individuals to push their selfish desires).

I believe there have been people on site that were neither regular members or limited members and as such would pose a liability should they or their property become damaged. Our insurance only covers approved usage according to our occupancy permit issued by Snohomish County. Any other usage would null and void our continued coverage. I hear lots of litigation talk from some of our members and I don't think it serves our purpose to have members doing whatever they want w/o approval. If they want to use TRC outside of the standing rules let them bring it up and seek permission via the proper channels. But I think it would be like the noise ordinance, being pushed from 10pm to Midnight and still there is no respect for the very rules they swore to abide by.

2) Over winter fee increase of $5.00 doesn't seem a hardship to me.


I think it best we discuss these items here and come up with a consensus to present to the BOD.

Anyone else have thoughts or concerns?

Thanks
CW
Hello Fellow TRC Executives and Chris Ellis

I've located the top page of Davis' 2010 renewal application to TRC. I have electronically covered up confidential info because email is not secure. (Chris, I'll provide you with a clean copy if you want. After all, as a co-defendant you're probably entitled to full disclosure.)

Craig Maynard






Re: Confidential Information - Davis Lawsuit - Settlement Conference - Offer?
Sent By:
[email protected] On:Sep 09/30/13 12:27 PM
To: Craig Maynard
Cc: Craig Wunder; Garrett Campbell; Jack Stahl

OK all,
Thinking like a Lawyer for a sec.

(1) Scott Davis cost TRC's VP of Operations in 2010-2011, much more than $ 150.00, "Spent in time and professional contact's that where used in investigating correspondence he generated under an assumed and fraudulent name".
So a Hell No from here.

(2) Scott Davis used TRC inside information to try and Deliberately Harm TRC's reputation as an organization and defame at least one of it's member.
(3) Scott Davis has created two now situations in less than 3 year's time that have required more than normal volunteer time to resolve..
(4) In actuality Sandy Stevenson has possession of his belongings and should be the one who is being sued instead of TRC.
So Hell no Twice more.

(5) Given all this: I would like to see TRC Demand that a Davis representative come to TRC Recreational Campground and remove from TRC property the belonging's and structures he seeks monetary reimbursement for.
(a) TRC 2013 Development found that the structure in question was not built to approved submitted plan.
(b) TRC 2013 Development spoke with currant site Coordinator, Site Coordinator informed TRC Development that structure does not meet Snohomish County Building Exempt structural standards.

(6) Given Scott Davis's small claim.
(a) TRC should handle this in the same way TRC would if there was a trailer on that site and this situation arose TRC would tow the trailer away and send a bill to the rightful person responsible for that bill and called it a day.
(b) TRC could serve Him with a small claims case for storage cost's, or removal fees for the structure he seeks reimbursement for.
(c) TRC is a business and needs to operate as such using it's full strength's as a business to resolve this issue and make sure this business does not encounter this problem again in the future.

(7) If TRC pays anything to Scott Davis the bottom line should be.
(a) TRC get's The site back and its continence.
(b) No site member of ShowWood Forest would be aloud to keep that site and ShowWood Forest site would go to the first person on the Semi-permanent site waiting list.
(c) TRC as a group would make decision on disposition of site and belonging left behind.
(d) TRC BOD would direct Executive to take action and follow up with the TRC BOD recommendations of situation resolution.


The site coordinator of this site should know what is happening at this point, Maybe some direct contact on TRC's part would help resolve the situation.

ShowWood Forest History
2010 Scott Davis Sends Letters to TRC creating the need for investigation into authenticity of letters.
2011 TRC gave John Segal from that site,many courtesies when he couldn't make the 48 hr rule due to his mother being on deaths door time and time again,
2012 Sandy Stevenson Violated 48 hr rule signing in when he was not staying the night. " I personally corrected 4 or more different sign-ins that where false entries."
2012 Incident report addressing "entering TRC secured structure without permission".
2013 Scott Davis sues TRC.

I say Find a way to rid TRC of these recurring problems with this site and it's members.
Given all the trouble from this one site Past and Present, I say Disband the site and redevelop that land.
That land would make a great reserve area for the shower toilet building in the future... and centrally located too!

You Asked Craig.
Those are my views.
P.
P.S. I will Chip In $40 buck's to this cause. If the above is the outcome. and TRC is threw with this whole site for ever.

Hello Folks

Most of you know that during yesterday's Board meeting Scott Davis had, via a 3rd person, served notice that he is suing TRC (and possibly Chris Ellis). Because we were served when the 2013 Executive Committee is still in office, but with the 2014 Executive Committee being in office when this matter is likely to be resolved, executives committees members from both years are getting copies of these documents. Garett will have these documents appended to the directors' meeting minutes. Also, TRC members were told of the lawsuit at the AGM.

I will research about the small-claims process and will report back to the 2013 EC about that process. Also, I'll confirm that the court has a record of service. At this point we should be able to tell whether Chris, as an individual, is also being sued. If it is only TRC, the 2013 EC can make a recommendation to the Board about whether to even attempt a mediated settlement. If there is no appetite for a settlement then TRC, via the Board or the EC, should select its representative. I understand that lawyers are not permitted to participate in small claims mediation or trials.

Please do not circulate these documents. Also, please do not publicly comment on the lawsuit or Davis. As you will see, part of his lawsuit includes an allegation about members of the Board. Therefore, TRC emails and Facebook posts are potential pieces of evidence in this lawsuit.

One last note, many of you may remember how difficult the events of three years ago were on Dale Morgan. As a courtesy to Dale, I phoned him today to advise him of what has happened and that the matter was in the hands of the 2013 EC. He sounded unworried.

That's it for now.

Craig
Hi folks

Garrett, quite rightly pointed out to me and Chris that she has protections from a lawsuit from TRC. Unfortunately, this bylaw does not excuse Ellis from the lawsuit, now. It only ensures that should there be a trial and a court find her liable, TRC must reimburse her, unless she engaged in willful misconduct or there was fraud.


The more urgent thing here, is that we try to convince Davis, first, and if need be, the court, second, to dismiss Ellis as a defendant. As I understand it, court actions that are in progress can affect one's credit score in the USA.


Craig

Here is Garrett's message thread:
From: TRC Secretary
Date: September 27, 2013 at 4:07:40 PM PDT
To: Craig Maynard
Cc: Chris Ellis
Subject: Re: Clarification of the List of Defendants in Davis Matter
Happily, Chris is protected by our own Bylaws in Article VII:

ARTICLE VII
INDEMNIFICATION OF OFFICERS AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS

Each director and/or officer serving the organization and each person who at the request of or on behalf of the organization is now serving, has served, or hereafter serves as a director or officer, and the respective heirs, executors, and administrators of each of them, shall be indemnified by the organization against all costs, expenses, judgments, and liabilities, including attorney fees, reasonably incurred by or imposed upon them in connection with or resulting from any action, suit or proceeding, civil or criminal, in which they are or may be made a party by reason of their being or having been such director or officer at the time of incurring such costs, expenses, judgments or liabilities, except in relation to matters as to which they shall be finally judged, without right of further appeal in such action, suit or proceeding, to have been liable for fraud or willful misconduct in the performance of their duty as director or officer.


Happy Trails!!
~ Garrett
TRC Secretary

On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Craig Maynard wrote:
Hi Chris

I've looked at the court docket regarding the Davis lawsuit and see that both you, as an individual, and TRC are listed as defendants. Here's the screen picture:




I will say to you what was said to me about all matters involving lawsuits, the best thing one can do is obtain independent legal advice. Speaking only as a fellow 2013 Executive Committees (EC) member, my advice is that you take at least a few hours, if not more, to decide whether you want to get that legal advice. Hang on, there's more.

Likewise, TRC to decide whether it will do the same thing. Because you, as an individual, are also named as a co-defendant, I believe that you would be in a conflict of interest to be part of the 2013 EC discussions about TRC obtaining legal advice. The conflict, in theory, is that as a defendant to a $5,000 lawsuit you should not be deciding whether TRC should say to the court that only TRC can be held liable for the events Davis alleges, and purportedly caused $5,000 in damages.

I have cc'd the TRC secretary to ask him to record this into the TRC records. Consequently, and he should correct me if I am wrong, the 2013 EC and Board needs to also be informed of this clarification. I can say to you that as one voice on the 2013 EC, I will strongly advocate that TRC take the position that in no way can you, as an individual, be held liable, in whole or in part, for anything arising from the Davis affair. But, I believe that that is a decision, without your participation, for the 2013 EC to decide.

Thankfully, TRC and you appear to be in agreement about the merits of Davis' lawsuit. As such, my discussion here may only be formalities, which may serve as a procedural example should a similar lawsuit occur in the future.

Regards

Craig

Sent from my iPad
Hi folks

I'm just doing some homework on the small claims process. To follow along, I've attached a hyperlink to the small claims procedures for Snohomish County for your information.

Regards
Craig

http://www1.co.snohomish.wa.us/Departments/District_Court/SmallClaimInformation.htm
Hi Folks

I sent this email to Chris yesterday and she sent me a reply last night, which I will copy to you folks. I still have to phone the court to determine if it is satisfied that TRC was properly served. I was hoping that the website would answer that question.

Hi Chris

I've looked at the court docket regarding the Davis lawsuit and see that both you, as an individual, and TRC are listed as defendants. Here's the screen picture:




I will say to you what was said to me about all matters involving lawsuits, the best thing one can do is obtain independent legal advice. Speaking only as a fellow 2013 Executive Committees (EC) member, my advice is that you take at least a few hours, if not more, to decide whether you want to get that legal advice. Hang on, there's more.

Likewise, TRC, via the EC, will have to decide whether it will do the same thing. Because you, as an individual, are also named as a co-defendant, I believe that you would be in a conflict of interest to be part of the 2013 EC discussions about TRC obtaining legal advice. The conflict, in theory, is that as a defendant to a $5,000 lawsuit you should not be deciding whether TRC should say to the court that only TRC can be held liable for the events Davis alleges, and purportedly caused $5,000 in damages.

I have cc'd the TRC secretary to ask him to record this email into the TRC records. Consequently, and he should correct me if I am wrong, the 2013 EC and Board needs to also be informed of this clarification. I can say to you that as one voice on the 2013 EC, I will strongly advocate that TRC take the position that in no way can you, as an individual, be held liable, in whole or in part, for anything arising from the Davis affair. But, I believe that that is a decision, without your participation, for the 2013 EC to decide.

Thankfully, TRC and you appear to be in agreement about the merits of Davis' lawsuit. As such, my discussion here may only be formalities, which may serve as a procedural example should a similar lawsuit occur in the future.

Regards,

Craig

Sent from my iPad
Hi folks

Garrett, quite rightly pointed out to me and Chris that she has protections from a lawsuit from TRC. Unfortunately, this bylaw does not excuse Ellis from the lawsuit, now. It only ensures that should there be a trial and a court find her liable, TRC must reimburse her, unless she engaged in willful misconduct or there was fraud.


The more urgent thing here, is that we try to convince Davis, first, and if need be, the court, second, to dismiss Ellis as a defendant. As I understand it, court actions that are in progress can affect one's credit score in the USA.


Craig

Here is Garrett's message thread:
From: TRC Secretary
Date: September 27, 2013 at 4:07:40 PM PDT
To: Craig Maynard
Cc: Chris Ellis
Subject: Re: Clarification of the List of Defendants in Davis Matter
Happily, Chris is protected by our own Bylaws in Article VII:
OK All,
Are we jumping the gun here guys?

What we need to recognize is TRC is a business as such we have the right to refuse service to anyone, and we do post that sign on site at TRC.

(1) TRC Reserves the right to refuse service.
(2) TRC Had a review of this members activities at TRC .
(3) TRC 2011 BOD decided unanimously in March of 2011 to expel him from organization for the time period of 3 years.
(4) 3 Year time period will not be up till March of 2014
(5) TRC Gave Scott Davis the Chance to retrieve his belongings stored at TRC.
(6) After the 2011 BOD decision Scott Davis turn his belongings and structure over to "Sandy Stevenson" site coordinator of ShowWood Forest and former camp mate.
(7) Scott Davis's Belongings are not being held by TRC, it's Directors or Executive Officers.
(8) Scott Davis's structure is being used by Scott Davis's Close friends and former camp-mates
(9) To have a Civil court intervene and tell TRC how to operate, set bylaws, and govern TRC's enforcement of ByLaws and or BOD directions on matter's dealing with the campground operation and policies and protection is impractical.
(10) The court cannot make a decision on this matter till after March of 2014. When TRC has actually kept him from his belongings he has left under someone else's control until that date.

I would recommend that TRC have a "Membership Processing Review Committee" consisting of 1/3 of active BOD members that given year. This would create a review process for membership and or renewal giving TRC another line of defense against this type of exposure.

My thoughts.
Preston.
Re: Davis Matter - TRC Bylaw Indemnifies Chris Ellis
Sent By:
dugsharp On:Sep 09/28/13 2:06 PM
To: [email protected]; Craig Maynard
Cc: Allan Hallsson; Mary Shearman; Chris Ellis; Craig Wunder; Jack Stahl; preston VP development; Garrett Campbell
You've brought up some very good points that could be included in our defense. Thanks Preston.




Sent from Samsung tablet



-------- Original message --------
From [email protected]
Date: 09/28/2013 12:49 PM (GMT-08:00)
To Craig Maynard
Cc Allan Hallsson ,Mary Shearman ,Doug Sharp ,Chris Ellis ,Craig Wunder ,Jack Stahl ,preston VP development ,Garrett Campbell
Subject Re: Davis Matter - TRC Bylaw Indemnifies Chris Ellis
Ever thought of going into law?
Re: Davis Matter - TRC Bylaw Indemnifies Chris Ellis
Sent By:
Chris Ellis On:Sep 09/28/13 6:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc Sent By:
Chris Ellis On:Sep 09/28/13 6:18 PM
To: [email protected]
Cc: Craig Maynard; Allan Hallsson; Mary Shearman; Doug Sharp; Craig Wunder; Jack Stahl; preston VP development; Garrett Campbell

Wow! Down counsellor. I'm with Chris; ever thought of Law School?

Craig

Sent from my iPad
No problem.

By the way, what was the website that had the best info on Chris Clark?

Cheers
Craig

Sent from my iPad

On Dec 23, 2012, at 5:27 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Craig.
I knew that you going help me threw this process and advise me one best action plan. I hope you will sit on the Development committee?
Best wishes for you both this holiday season.. Preston
________________________________________
From: "Craig Maynard"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 4:27:48 PM
Subject: Re: Western Engineers...
Hi Preston

Thanks for the conversation, today.

I do think that the info about the Turner property does need to be shared with the executive fairly soon. The stuff about Clark, not so much.

Regarding how you plan to run your committee, I'd recommend that you publicly talk to a lot of people about they want. Let them talk your ear off, without saying anything about your plans. You can later say that there was no consensus. That will give you the mandate to make the decisions you want to make without appearing arbitrary.

Merry Christmas and all the best to you and yours.

Craig and Iggy

On 2012-12-23, at 3:15 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Sure Craig. well have my phone on me as soon as I send this out.. Preston
________________________________________
From: "Craig Maynard"
To: [email protected]
Sent: Sunday, December 23, 2012 1:49:02 AM
Subject: Re: Western Engineers...
Hi Preston

Can I call you on Sunday?

Cheers
Craig

On 2012-12-22, at 9:50 PM, [email protected] wrote:

Hay Craig,
Hear you had a few view's on the way the meeting went. Understandably I was a bit put back as well but didn't want to act any way but executable as a representative of TRC. I had fully expected nothing less, so it was no surprise. That is why I was so agreeable to head to the upper forty. I do have information that i would like to share with you regarding Clark. Preston
Hi Preston.

The PDF documents appear to be partial scans of the documents. You can always send me the msword document.

Regards
Craig

PS Great work.

On 2013-01-27, at 10:22 AM, [email protected] wrote:
Craig & Jack. Our Eye only
I think if we can find a way to make these files interactive Like you spoke of it would be fantastic.
Thanks Guys for your input.
Preston
Dana

________________________________________
Subject: Re: Sorry
From: [email protected]
Date: Mon, 19 May 2014 20:00:02 -0700
To: [email protected]
Too bad I was looking forward to talking with you about water

Thanks

Sent from my iPhone

On May 19, 2014, at 6:45 PM, "Preston Canonica" wrote:
Dana
Unfortunately I won't be back to camp until next BOD meeting.
To not hold the process up at all.what I can do is give you a report as past V.P. and attach pertinent e-mails from our potable water engineer and well pump professionals bids to assist you in understanding the issues with that system..
If that will help let me know.
Preston.

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE Smartphone


-------- Original message --------
From: Dana Williams
Date:05/18/2014 1:03 AM (GMT-08:00)
To: Preston Canonica
Subject: RE: Sorry
Preston:

If you are up next Wednesday - Sunday ..lets get together and talk about what is known by you of the status of the potable water issue.
Let me know what day works best for you.


Thanks

Dana
________________________________________
Date: Sun, 18 May 2014 00:20:14 -0700
Subject: Sorry
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]

Talked to Bob. And if you need info on water issues just ask I have all e-mails sent by water engineer and bids form 2 professionals for pump installation. And recommendations if you need it. Just ask any info I acquired I have stored for this purpose.
Preston.
The attachment is empty olease resend thanks
________________________________________
Date: Wed, 21 May 2014 01:22:57 +0000
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Fwd: Recomendations for TRC water System

________________________________________
From: "Todd Krause"




Thank you,
Preston S. Canonica
TRC VP of Development 2013
253-732-7928
Hi Preston,

We have had copyright complaint. Someone was downloading defiance at the camp on Sunday at 8:54AM.

We will be screwed if this happens again.
Ross Tremblay
Tremblay Computer Services
1118 Lily Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 4H6 Let me know when you are going to be at camp so I can login through your computer to make adjustments on the router
Ross Tremblay
Tremblay Computer Services
1118 Lily Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 4H6
(604) 683-3999
Will try and sort it out. If you need to connect with a wire you'll need to do it in the bar.
I'm working on Thursday will email as soon as I get in. If you Internet connection is working OK leave your laptop plugged in in our kitchen - lid open and on.
Check email occasionally and I'll be in toch.
Ross Tremblay
Tremblay Computer Services
1118 Lily Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 4H6
(604) 683-3999

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 2:03 PM, wrote:
Ok, Then when I get to camp I will e-mail you then try and stay close to my computer so you can take it over and do you magic... also Ross have had some problems with my internet accessibility at camp on Sat night and Sunday .. shows that internet adapter not avable or something but when dialog box pulls up it did not Identify any wifi network or anything .. you may want to try and take control of it now and see... otherwise I would have to plug in cat5 cable to have any internet at camp...
Thanks Ross..
All my Best..
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:48:36 PM
Subject: Re: I need to adjust the router
Not really - all we have is who might have been logged in Sunday morning. When you are back at camp this weekend I need to login through your computer so I can make some adjustments to the router to reduce the possibility of future complaints.

Just saw your other message come in. I should be home Thursday night and will be in touch.
Thanks,
Ross Tremblay
Tremblay Computer Services
1118 Lily Street, Vancouver, B.C. V5L 4H6
(604) 683-3999
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:45 PM, wrote:
Is there any way to find out who could have been doing that.?
Sent: Tuesday, July 23, 2013 1:27:25 PM
Subject: I need to adjust the router
Hi Preston,

We have had copyright complaint. Someone was downloading defiance at the camp on Sunday at 8:54AM.

We will be screwed if this happens again.
Ross don't know if you got e-mail I sent from my phone.. it is Ken and Raffie came under fire for turning off internet when they went to bed saying they where abusing TRC property.
Given the downloading complaint can we scale back the internet to 9am to 11pn.