
04/28/2025
What are people for? Windell Berry once posed this question but his essay & every philosopher before or since has fallen far short of a clear answer to this ancient inquiry. Now this question burns deeper in my conscience as the AI revolution, still in its infancy, begins its inexorable rise leading us at best to utopia & at worst to economic ruin & irrelevant, sidelined existence...maybe even extinction.
So, what are people for? It seems like a simple, even stupid question. But zoom out from you 9-5, from your position in the rat race, from your political ideology, from your mortgage, from your bills, your obligations - and ask the question again...what are people for? More likely than not the answer you conjure is not to consume, to clock in & out, to commute, to invest, to mow the yard, to compete, to scroll...it’s easier to say what people are NOT for than what they are.
So far so cliche. You’ve heard all this before & you’re probably asking with some annoyance, “So Tyson, what are people for?” Frustratingly, I still don’t know. But I think the answer, if there is one, is to be closer to what our 4 million years of evolution designed. We hunted. We gathered. We worked little, compared to today. We formed small, strong bands of mostly egalitarian communities. We wore little, if any clothing. We had no religion as we know it today. Private property & ownership were understood but not valued.
Don’t get me wrong. Our ancient ancestors struggled too. Life was short, sometimes violent & always precarious. But perhaps we can blend the best of the prehistoric ways with its egalitarian communities, reliance on nature & the simplicity of hunting/gathering with the best of the modern ways with its laws, scientific advancements & abundance. We CAN have both & on our homestead, we do. It requires work, sacrifice, & active rebellion to not be overtaken by the stresses of both the old & modern ways & keeps us forever asking “what are people for”? -Photos by