01/03/2026
Respectful Communications Animal Training follows the FAIR PLAY WITH DOG Code
We base our approach on the latest scientific findings in canine science. Our approach to training and general handling of dogs is therefore scientifically and empirically grounded.
The dog's well-being and health are paramount, as they significantly influence its behavior and learning ability. The individualized, highly effective training plan always aims to achieve the training goal while minimizing stress and anxiety and maintaining the dog's overall well-being.
Our training approaches never involve the systematic, targeted application of pain or fright stimuli, anxiety-inducing stimuli, intimidation, or the deprivation of the feeling of control.
Our training approaches are based on the following models:
"Least Intrusive Principle"
Principle of minimally invasive effective treatment according to Friedman, 2016
© Friedman & Fritzler, 2024
«LIFE Model»
Least inhibitive, functionally effective model according to
© Fernandez, 2024
This means for us:
We prioritize the well-being and health of the dog. We meet the dog's basic physical and mental needs at all times and provide it with protection and security.
We act proactively and take management measures adapted to the situation in order to prevent undesirable behavior from arising in the first place (Antecendent Arrangement).
We focus on the causes of the behavior. With negative emotions, we transform them into positive ones.
We follow a needs-based approach. This means we take into account the individual, breed-specific, and natural needs of the dog.
We use interventions, learning techniques, and training measures that inhibit behavior as little as possible and instead give the animal as many choices as possible.
In addition to operant conditioning, we use other forms of learning such as observational learning, insight learning and social learning, classical conditioning/counterconditioning, as well as systematic desensitization, habituation and sensitization.
We focus on learning and reinforcing alternative behaviors to sustainably change undesirable behavior.
Operant conditioning
We work on the basis of positive reinforcement.
Negative punishment is used briefly and at the lowest possible level of frustration and stress. The dog is given the opportunity to exhibit desired behavior as quickly as possible, which is then positively reinforced.
If negative reinforcement is used, the potentially unpleasant stimulus is presented at the lowest possible intensity (e.g., by increasing the distance to a fear-inducing stimulus).
In all training methods, the well-being and safety of all involved is paramount, and we avoid frightening, intimidating, causing pain, deliberately overtaxing, or creating a feeling of loss of control.
For reasons of learning biology and ethics, we refrain from the targeted use of positive punishment and thus the deliberate infliction of physical and/or psychological stimuli that, for example, trigger fear, terror, pain, and/or a feeling of loss of control. In emergency situations, or due to overwhelm and in the heat of the moment, things can happen that are aversive for the dog. However, this has nothing to do with planned and targeted training.
Interpretations of dog behavior
To assess canine behavior, we rely on scientifically proven findings regarding body language and a benevolent interpretation. We distance ourselves from behavioral labels such as "dominant," "disrespectful," or "cheeky," as well as from scientifically refuted interpretations based on the "dominance model" in the human-dog relationship ("hierarchy," "alpha," "pack leader"), which are used to legitimize aversive actions (Bradshaw et al., 2009; Yin, 2007).
Continuous professional development
New scientific findings are constantly being published, and the practical application is continuously being adapted and changed in its details. We are committed to ongoing professional development in order to incorporate new insights into our work.
Collaboration with specialists:
It is a strength to recognize one's own limits of experience and competence. Should we reach our limits in a difficult case (especially with fearful or aggressive behavior), the right next step is to involve or refer the case early to an experienced professional who supports the code (behavioral training, dog training, behavioral medicine, veterinary medicine, physiotherapy, etc.).
Our ethical stance
We believe that the end does not justify the means if the means are disproportionate and better alternatives exist.
Our actions are guided by an ethical framework. We consider the interests and capacity for suffering of all living beings involved and always strive to sustainably improve the situation for all living beings involved.
We are aware that dogs are sentient beings capable of suffering. We are in a position of power and therefore have a responsibility to meet their needs as best as possible, to protect their interests, and to strive for and maintain their emotional and physical well-being.
Imagine having a dog that: walks calmly beside you and enjoys sitting for attention. You can have that well mannered dog in your home!