The Wolf Witch of Coös

The Wolf Witch of Coös A tired old, queer, anarchist, AuDHD Gaelic Reconstructionist Witch and banfénnid. Trying to build some local leftist Pagan community.

No transphobes, homophobes, misogynists, racists or other bigots! Tolerance Paradox rules

I am a Wolf of the Morrígan I've repurposed this page, as I wasn't really using it anyway. I want to focus on NH (and some VT and ME, perhaps) paranormal lore and such. But as I am a Pagan Witch, living in Coos County, NH, where there seems to be little community effort happening, I thought I'd also try to

post Pagan events and the like happening here in Coos County. I will consider other parts of northern NE if not too far, but most of those areas are covered.

06/05/2026

The Department of Defense has reduced its recognized religious affiliation codes from more than 200 to just 31, eliminating Pagans, Asatru, Druidry, and Wicca, along with numerous other minority faiths and secular worldviews, in a move officials say will streamline chaplaincy support for service mem...

06/03/2026

Forget whatever mention of Wicca you remember from Charmed (we still get people asking how to avoid personal gain and that's not even a Wiccan thing, it was a contrivance for the show). Pagan is an umbrella term for several (usually European-based, though some do fold in southern Mediterranean paths such as Egyptian Kemeticism and Canaanite reconstructionism) different modern revivals, reconstructions or re-imaginations of dead religions. There are no fully unbroken Pagan traditions, anyone claiming they are from one is lying to you or themselves (or, like I once did, see folk traditions as evidence without understanding cultural syncretization).

Wicca is just one (or, rather, a few as there are different "denominations" now, but I don't want to bombard you with too much information) of those attempts to revive a Pagan religion. This one happens to have been assembled by Gerald Gardner in the mid 20th century. Wicca is a religion that uses witchcraft as part of their religion.

Witchcraft in and of itself is not a religion but a collection of magical practices that can work outside of or along with any religion. Not every modern Pagan religion embraces magic. Not every modern witch identifies as Pagan. The terms are all fairly broad because they cover a number of cultures and practices, but they are not interchangeable.

It is hard to recommend books without knowing what appeals, as such, I will recommend a short list:

New World Witchery by Cory Thomas Hutchinson

Grimoire: A Guide for Modern Cunningfolk by Peter Paddon

Besom, Stang and Sword by Christopher Orapello and his wife who has changed her name to Matilda Ethel Thorn since the release of the book, which instead uses her old name.

Folk Witchcraft by Roger Horne

The Dabbler's Guide to Witchcraft by Fire Lyte

You will notice that none of my recommendations are about Wicca because I am not a Wiccan. These are all based in folk magic and Traditional Witchcraft (which is different from Wicca for a variety of reasons).

06/03/2026
Perhaps there's a theme for today, about sharing what you have to give. Few have billions of dollars, few have cultural ...
06/03/2026

Perhaps there's a theme for today, about sharing what you have to give. Few have billions of dollars, few have cultural folk knowledge (see my previous repost).....but we can all something. Maybe it's just a kind word? Something. If everyone did this, none of us would be lacking in what we need.

In 1992, a young woman named MacKenzie Tuttle graduated from Princeton University with a degree in English literature. She had studied under Toni Morrison, who later called her one of the best creative writing students she had ever taught.

Sharp, disciplined, and gifted with language, MacKenzie took a job at a high-performing New York hedge fund called D.E. Shaw, where a conventional career in finance seemed to await her.

Then she met Jeff Bezos.
He had an unusual idea — selling books on the internet. Most people who heard it dismissed it. MacKenzie did not. She married him in 1993, helped pack their belongings into a car, and drove cross-country to Bellevue, Washington.

In a rented garage, with a few computers and no guarantee of anything, they built Amazon together. In those earliest days there were no vast teams or polished systems. There were two people packing boxes, answering customer calls, writing business materials, and building something from nothing.

She was there at the very beginning of all of it.
As Amazon grew into a global force, MacKenzie stepped back to raise their four children and pursue her own writing. She published two well-regarded novels, taught writing, and lived quietly and largely out of public view for most of the next two decades.

Then, in January 2019, Jeff Bezos announced their div*rce. The settlement gave MacKenzie approximately four percent of Amazon's shares — worth roughly $36 to $38 billion at the time — making her one of the wealthiest people on earth, essentially overnight.
What she did next is what this story is actually about.

Within months, she signed the Giving Pledge, a commitment to donate the majority of her wealth to charitable causes. Her letter explaining the decision was short and striking. She did not describe the fortune as her personal achievement. She described it as something built by the collective labor of countless people — something that needed to be returned, not kept.

She meant it.
She built a small, focused team and created a philanthropic initiative called Yield Giving. The approach was deliberately different from how most billionaires give. No lengthy applications. No required progress reports. No conditions attached. No press releases issued in her name. Instead, her team quietly identified organizations doing serious, underfunded work in overlooked communities — then called them out of nowhere and told them a large unrestricted gift was on its way.

Many recipients thought it was a scam. Some asked the caller to repeat the number. Others wept.

She gave hundreds of millions to Historically Black Colleges and Universities — the largest single gift in the institutional history of many of them. She gave $436 million to Habitat for Humanity. She directed enormous gifts to food banks, climate organizations, racial equity groups, women's health initiatives, immigration services, rural communities, tribal colleges, shelters, and prison reform programs — causes that larger, more image-conscious philanthropists had long considered too unglamorous or too complicated.

In 2025 alone, she donated $7.17 billion to 186 organizations. That single year of giving exceeded the entire lifetime charitable giving of her former husband. Her total giving since 2019 now stands at $26.3 billions across more than 2,700 organization.

Forbes places her third among all living philanthropists in lifetime giving — behind only Warren Buffett and Bill Gates — and she reached that position in just six years.

Her net worth still sits at approximately $38 to $40 billion despite all of it. The stock keeps rising faster than she can give it away.
Here is the part most people do not know.

MacKenzie Scott did not grow up wealthy. At Princeton, she struggled. A local dentist once gave her free dental work after seeing her use denture glue on a broken tooth because she could not afford care. A college roommate loaned her $1,000 when she was nearly unable to pay tuition and on the edge of dropping out. Those 2 small acts of generosity from strangers never left her. They are part of why she gives the way she does — quietly, without transaction, without expecting anything back.

She has no named buildings. No branded foundation. No public speeches. She does not attend galas in her honor because she does not hold them. In her 2025 year-end essay, she described herself as one small part of a much larger story — the dollar total of her giving a tiny fraction of the care being shared into communities every year by ordinary people.

She is also a novelist. A mother of four. A woman who once worked in a garage when a company had nothing, and who is now systematically redistributing a fortune built from that same company — not to cement a legacy, but simply because she believes other people need it more than she does.

There is a word for that.
Not philanthropy. Not strategy.
Just generosity. The same kind a dentist once showed a young woman with a br*ken tooth, and a roommate showed a friend who was crying over tuition.

It ripples forward.
Apparently, it always does.

06/03/2026
06/03/2026

🏳️‍🌈

06/03/2026

What you "need" to do is entirely up to the style of witchcraft you end up being drawn to, however, intention is certainly not everything (if only for basic safety with fire and so you don't poison yourself or others).

Like ceremonial magic? Then you will "need" complex tables of correspondences, fancy tools, specific movements, lots of pre-ritual prep. Without all of that, you aren't performing that style of magic. A lot of the Wiccan ritual format descends from this practice, so if this style vibes with you, you may enjoy the ritual aspects of the Wiccan religion. To be clear: there is more to witchcraft than Wicca, Wicca is simply a religion that uses an old word for witch and uses witchcraft as part of their religious observance. Not all witches are Wiccan, it used to be treated as the default (and you still get folks who treat Wiccan morality as universal to all witchcraft), but the landscape of modern witchcraft as greatly expanded beyond Wicca and it's 80s-2000s book descendants.

Prefer folk magic? That will likely vary quite a bit based on the culture you are working from, but most of those are much more practical for spells (unlike ceremonial magic) unless there is a specific thing you are trying to do that involve specific days or specific actions or taboos (as with certain rituals to gain psychic gifts or old-style self initiation rituals like walking a churchyard widdershins at night). Of course, for general spells, there are "best times" for success but that doesn't mean you don't do a spell when the need arises. Life doesn't wait for the right moon phase or zodiac sign.

06/02/2026

Can you imagine how unpopular neckties would become if we could actually perform Substitutiary Locomotion?

06/01/2026

Rabbit, rabbit, rabbit

PLEASE, Witches!!!! STOP using AI!!!! You're damaging nature every time, at a rapid rate for something that is 100% USEL...
05/30/2026

PLEASE, Witches!!!! STOP using AI!!!!

You're damaging nature every time, at a rapid rate for something that is 100% USELESS!!! The water usage alone is something the Earth can NOT handle, certainly humans and other animals will NOT survive it for long. If you are here in NH you know we've had a drought, some of the state is still in drought and the rest of us are "severely dry." This is true for most of the US, actually.

You are stealing from artists and writers who are trying to survive on their work!!!!

And it looks like crap and makes people who know what is happening think you are foolish and fake.

As the "dean" of The Sarah Connor Charm School as well as a nature loving swamp Witch, I certainly have zero respect for you. But I do hope you will change and stop.

I would be less concerned (beyond the environmental impact) if she was designing a tarot deck specifically. Basic tarot is old enough to be public domain (this doesn't mean it won't steal images from newer designs) and has a structure that the AI can research and follow for design and meanings and most tarot decks are redesigns of the RWS designs as it is. To be clear: I still don't like it, but it concerns me ethically rather than spiritually.

However, oracle decks are much more personally designed and spiritually motivated. Beyond the art theft that is happening, beyond the environmental impact is the fact that AIs are programmed to learn what you want to hear and mirror it back to you. When used for spiritual things, it's like mainlining the love bombing of a cult in that it will reinforce and validate things that have little to no actual basis. For basic research, it can hallucinate whole books and authors that you then try to find as sources for your research projects only to realize that source isn't real. Now, spread that idea to spiritual questions, things you can only verify through personal discernment and people start essentially giving the personal discernment work to an AI programmed to validate them. This is how we get people making wild spiritual claims and publicly spiralling into something that very much presents as spiritual psychosis to those watching.

If it's "just for the art" (but she has you and you offered to help), then it's probably less dangerous on that level, however, since she declined your help, it worries me that it isn't "just for the art" and she's letting the AI guide the whole project. Which means she's asking it opinions on spiritual concepts and that road can very quickly move beyond just the deck and into spiritual folly.

Address

Colebrook, NH
03576

Website

https://www.teepublic.com/user/teotwcharmschool/, https://dunsgathan.ne

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when The Wolf Witch of Coös posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share