06/10/2026
fans সত্য মিথ্যা যাচাই করতে হলে একটু পড়তে হবে...
পুরো ফালতু কথা। আমি আজ থেকে দুই দিন আগে Hashem Al Ghalili নামের এক বিদেশি post monetizer এর পোস্টে এই কথা পড়ে আতঙ্কিত হয়ে research করছিলাম। কারণ, আমি শুধু ক্যাট ফুড বিক্রেতা নয়, সবার উপরে আমি গোটা দশেক বিড়ালের পিতা। তারা সবাই আজ 6 বছর ধরে কেবল ক্যাট ফুড খায় আর ডাক্তার কাকে বলে ভুলে গেছে। বছর এ একবার করে বাড়ির indoor বিড়ালদের সবার blood test করাই, কিন্তু কিছু ত্রুটি পাইনা।
আর সেই Hashem এর পোস্ট হওয়ার পর থেকেই সমানে কেউ না কেউ famous হওয়ার জন্যে ওই পোস্ট অনুবাদ করে ফেবুতে নিজের research বলে চালিয়ে যাচ্ছে। Hashem Al Ghalili নাম ফেবুতে search করে দেখুন। পৃথিবীতে এমন কোনও topic নেই যা নিয়ে সে পোস্ট করেনা। ও হলো পেশাদার ফেবু পণ্ডিত। বছর খানেক ধরে ওর বিভিন্ন পোস্ট আমার feed এ আসে আর আমি research করে দেখি আমার interest এর topic যদি হয়। Research যে কেউ করতে পারে আজকাল--এত AI app আছে আজকাল!
আমিও research করেছি AI দিয়ে। আপনারও করতে পারেন। আমার কথা বিশ্বাস করার দরকার নেই।
Research result of research:
Question:
Is there any truth in this Facebook post of Hashem AlGhalili at (link দিয়েছিলাম)...Almost every cat food tested found to contain toxic heavy metals, plastics, and pesticides.
Experts are calling it a very real threat to feline health.
Researchers from Clean Label Projec tested 100 popular wet, dry, and freeze-dried products across 62 major brands, testing for more than 120 toxins. The findings are staggering: lead was detected in 99% of samples, cadmium in 96%, and arsenic in 94%.
Even products marketed as 'natural' or 'organic' frequently contained these toxic elements, alongside plastic-associated phthalates and the herbicide glyphosate.
Because cats typically eat the same food every day, these toxic substances accumulate over time, presenting a severe risk for chronic kidney disease, which is already a leading cause of death in older cats. Heavy metal exposure varies by recipe; seafood-based diets harbor up to 18 times more mercury than poultry-based meals, though poultry dishes showed higher lead levels. To minimize chronic exposure, experts recommend rotating protein sources, avoiding food with plants in the top ten ingredients, and prioritizing wet or air-dried formulas over dry kibble.
source: Clean Label Project. (2026). Cat Food Category Report: Heavy Metals and Contaminants in Top-Selling Brands.
Answer from AI:
Yes — there is a real study behind that Facebook post, and many of its headline numbers are genuine. But the Facebook version turns a legitimate contamination survey into a much stronger health warning than the evidence supports.
I checked the original Clean Label Project material published on October 2, 2026, rather than relying on the Facebook post. �
Clean Label Project:
What is true--
Clean Label Project tested 100 cat-food products from 62 brands, covering wet, dry, air-dried and freeze-dried products, for more than 122 contaminants using an independent ISO-17025-accredited laboratory. �
Clean Label Project
The headline findings really are:
What the study actually found--in the percentages of the total number of tested products...
Lead in 99%
Yes
Cadmium in 96%
Yes
Arsenic in 94%
Yes
Fish/seafood has much more mercury
Yes — about 18× other foods
Dry food has more lead
Yes — about 3× wet/air-dried
Plastic-related chemicals detected
Yes
Glyphosate detected
Yes
100 products / 62 brands
Yes
The important wording, however, is "detected." Clean Label Project itself explicitly says that finding lead, cadmium or arsenic does not mean that the food is dangerous. It doesn't mention that the percentage of those contaminants in the individual samples being beyond tolerable limits�
Clean Label Project
And this is the biggest problem with the Facebook post.
"Toxic heavy metals" IS NOT EQUAL TO "toxic levels"
Lead, cadmium and arsenic are indeed toxic substances. But the mere detection of a substance does not establish that the concentration is toxic or that eating the product causes disease.
For example, you can detect trace quantities of contaminants in many foods because these substances occur naturally in soil, water, fish and agricultural ingredients. The relevant questions are:
How much? How often? What is the cat's exposure? What is the toxicological threshold?
The Clean Label Project report itself says its results are comparative within the category and are not a safety determination for an individual product. �
Clean Label Project
That's a pretty important qualification that the Facebook post conveniently leaves out.
The kidney-disease claim is the biggest exaggeration!
The post says these contaminants are "presenting a severe risk for chronic kidney disease."
That has not been demonstrated by this study.
The study found contaminants in food. It did not follow cats consuming those foods and demonstrate that they developed kidney disease as a consequence.
The connection is biologically plausible — kidneys are involved in handling/eliminating many toxic substances, and excessive exposure to some heavy metals can certainly damage kidneys. The FDA itself recognizes arsenic, cadmium, mercury and lead as potentially harmful trace contaminants in animal food. �
U.S. Food and Drug Administration
But that's very different from proving:
"99% of cat foods contain enough lead to cause chronic kidney disease." The study does not show that.
There's another important criticism:
The Pet Food Institute has already responded to the study, arguing that Clean Label Project uses its own proprietary "purity standard" rather than established regulatory safety standards or a conventional risk assessment. �
Pet Food Institute
That doesn't mean the CLP findings should be dismissed. Their laboratory testing is real and potentially useful.
It means we should distinguish between:
"We found measurable contaminants."
and
"These foods are unsafe."
Those are not equivalent conclusions.
What about "avoid plants in the top ten ingredients"?
This is also too simplistic.
CLP found that in 35 of the 100 foods, plant ingredients made up most of the top ten ingredients despite meat/fish being listed first. �
Clean Label Project
And they found a relationship between plant ingredients and glyphosate. That's worth investigating.
But that doesn't establish that plant ingredients themselves are bad for cats. Cats can absolutely consume nutritionally appropriate plant-derived ingredients in properly formulated diets.
Likewise, "natural" or "organic" doesn't automatically mean contaminant-free. That's a reasonable point.
What I would actually realize as a cat owner:
I wouldn't panic and throw away commercial cat food because of this study.
But I would take the fish/seafood finding seriously, particularly if a cat is being fed a fish-heavy diet exclusively for years.
The study found approximately 18× higher mercury in fish/seafood foods, and CLP itself suggests considering rotation away from exclusive fish feeding. �
Clean Label Project
And there's a sensible broader principle here:
Don't feed one recipe/protein exclusively for an animal's entire life if you can provide a nutritionally complete rotation of appropriate diets.
That isn't because "all cat food is toxic." It's because varying nutritionally complete foods can reduce dependence on any one ingredient source and contaminant exposure pattern.
One thing I'd be particularly careful about
The Facebook post says:
"Almost every cat food tested found to contain toxic heavy metals, plastics, and pesticides."
That's rhetorically effective but scientifically sloppy.
The actual finding was that almost every tested product had detectable quantities of certain heavy metals. It did not establish that almost every product contained dangerous concentrations of all those substances.
So my verdict would be:
The underlying study is real. The percentages are largely accurate. The Facebook post is misleading in its interpretation and considerably overstates the demonstrated health risk.
And interestingly, this is a brand-new October 2026 study, so I would not yet treat it as the final word on commercial cat-food safety. �
Clean Label Project
If you want, I can go one step further and look at the actual 100 products tested and identify which brands/products sold in India — including Purina, Royal Canin, Whiskas, Sheba, Me-O, etc. — were actually tested and where they ranked. That would be much more useful for RKD Pet Shop than the scary Facebook headline.
যদি ভারতে, তথা বাংলায় মানুষের খাদ্য উপযোগী মাছ ও মাংসের test করা হয়, তাহলে আরও ভয়ংকর তথ্য পাবেন। পালাবে কোথায়? কি খাবে?
It's The Animal Welfare Shop, it's The Pet Supplies Shop in North Kolkata that has largest customer base at National Level, providing packed sales for all tails across the country by courier!!! We don't sell animals, we serve them.
Call and WhatsAp
