
22/08/2025
Some horses should never be ridden, but why does that still make people uneasy?
I think there’s a deep cultural story here. Horses have long been framed in terms of what they can do for us.
They are rideable.
Workable.
Useful.
Horses that cannot be ridden are often labelled as 'problem' horses. They are termed 'useless', or 'wasted'. I see this mindset all over social media. Endless responses on threads asking what to do with a 'broken' horse. There may be one lone voice that will be honest, but the majority will be suggesting the horse is being an *insert any word suggesting laziness or lack of respect for humans here*.
Some horses will be declared 'fit to ride following a vet investigation'. This is usually said to ward off those likely to suggest pain is a contributory factor in most undesired behaviours. I get it, vet investigations are bank breaking but that's not an excuse to ignore the signs.
Making them rideable again becomes less about the horse’s wellbeing and more about showing how impressive the trainer's skills are. There are big egos at play. The story of the rider who 'turned the unrideable horse around' carries weight in many circles. It paints trainers as skilled, maybe even heroic. But whose need is that really serving? The horse’s, or ours?
But here's the truth: not every horse should be ridden. Heck, might we even wonder if any horse should be ridden (but I'm not quite ready to go there yet). Some are living with pain that no training will fix. Some have chronic lameness, neurological issues, metabolic disorders; for some, their conformation limits mean their bodies are simply not able to carry riders without suffering. Ignoring that because we badly want to be part of the 'rehabilitation' narrative does the horse no kindness at all.
Accepting that fact forces us to confront uncomfortable questions. If a horse doesn’t need to be ridden to have value, then what is their value? Can we really allow them to be enough as they are? Can we learn to find joy in other ways of being together through groundwork, scentwork, enrichment, or simply companionship, without constantly trying to fit them into the old story of usefulness?
If we can let go of 'rideable' as the ultimate proof of success, we open the door to something different. We choose the horse’s reality over our own. We learn to see them not as projects to be fixed, but as living beings whose lives matter whether or not they ever carry a rider again. Maybe at that point we might find that riding is back on the cards for some horses, but most likely we won’t.
If we claim to love horses, then surely love has to mean more than usefulness.
I hope you enjoy a summer weekend of alternative 'being' with your horse.