06/02/2022
This is a story I like to call “opening the fridge”
My Doberman has a baseline of being a medium drive dog, with the ability to get to very aroused, high drive states at times. When she was a puppy and I opened the fridge, one or two times she probably tried to sniff or put her head in the fridge. All I used was my body language to block her. This was enough for her to “get the message” and now she politely stands a good few feet back from the fridge as it’s opened. That’s not to say she might not “air sniff” to check out the goods!! I never rewarded her for not putting her head in the fridge, despite being a “PAWsitive Pursuit” based trainer.
Enter my very high drive Malinois puppy who is now 6 months old. Her baseline, let's say, is “cracked” at all times. When I open the fridge, she has near enough strength to bulldoze me out the way if she tries, and wow, the fridge smells good, so there’s a lot of desire to get into it!
Now, there are a variety of management techniques (keeping her out of the kitchen, tethering her, stay on a place etc), but it doesn’t completely solve the issue. If I reward her for a sit stay (in position, or throwing the food away from the fridge), I might create expectant behaviour and condition; fridge opening noise = treat.
Milder body language like standing in the way is less effective, her desire to override my signals is strong! How far am I willing to go? Mildly verbally correcting her (“ahh-ahh”) might not be enough and I'm unwilling to escalate to intimidating her by shouting. I AM willing to hold her back as she tries to bulldoze. This technique will work and it’s clear communication that the fridge is out of bounds. She may find this frustrating and if she gets a little spicy, I'm patient, fair and understanding about this.
So why might a balanced trainer be more ready to correct a high drive dog? I think it’s because their desire is so strong, that often they dismiss subtle body language signs we can give them, that other dogs might listen to readily.. A positive trainer doesn’t have to be permissive, but maybe we don’t have to correct either.