05/05/2026
Hear, Hear๐๐๐๐๐
Before and after footage...
We don't need it.
As a dog trainer with over 17 years experience, I don't need to see my client's dog acting aggressively or their reactivity in order to resolve it. The client explains what the dog dies, at what distance, for how long, how quickly they can recover etc.
It's truly amazing the amount of information you can glean from someone if you ask the right questions and carefully observe the dog.
If the dog I'm working with kicks off at another dog, I've made a mistake somewhere along the line. If your training requires the dog to kick off, so you can shock, choke, strike, shout at, or stick metal prongs in their neck to "correct" it, I suggest you examine your ethics and knowledge.
If I provide video evidence of a dog being aggressive/reactive to dogs or people, and there's a future issue with that dog, I've provided information into the public sphere which may be detrimental to my client.
I rarely directly publish on social media details about any bites, or the level of aggression shown. This is to protect both human and canine clients.
I provide reports regularly in dog bite cases for court, and have 23 years experience in operational policing. Given this, my need to look after the public and my clients takes precedence over some random half wit on social demanding I show before and after footage.
I'd go as far to say that those who do show this footage care more about likes, clicks, and attention on social media than their clients and the public.
It's not necessary and, in fact, detrimental to the needs of all in question.
If you want to know how to resolve aggression and reactivity with your dog, click the link in the bio.