16/10/2017
I’ve been inundated by a letter from a Mrs Trellis from North Wales who says, “I’m considering looking at the hydrology of what could charitably be described as the morass out the back here, but I’m really not sure how deep I should make my dipwells so that I can monitor the elevation of the phreatic water table effectively. Can you help?”
Well Mrs Trellis, I’m told there’s actually lots to do in North Wales, but if you’re committed I might be able to help. Before we embark on the nitty-gritty, may I congratulate you on your appreciation of the terms dipwell and phreatic water table, which saves quite a bit of time, although could I suggest that referring to your morass as a wetland might sound a bit more positive!
Now, it’s all a bit of a balancing act really, with two main considerations:
1. Dipwells need to be shallow enough that they don’t provide a conduit for flow in response to vertical hydraulic gradients. I’ll spare you the detail, but the worst-case here is creating your own geyser in the wetland, and having a profound effect on what you’re trying to measure – not good (left-hand example in the diagram).
2. They need to be deep enough to measure the lowest water table elevation that you might be interested in, which depends on the type of wetland you have out the back. The water table in sand-dune wetlands (dune slacks) can go to 2 m below the surface, but normally any lower than 1 m below the surface means either that it’s not a wetland or that it’s got very serious (and probably obvious) hydrological problems (centre example).
Experience leads me to installing 1 m long dipwells to around 0.9 m depth, unless there is evidence to suggest, or a requirement to do, something different. This eliminates the two problems above (right-hand example).
Good luck with your hydrometric endeavors, and don’t hesitate to write again on related subjects….