16/02/2026
Thanks to over 100,000 signatures on the petition against it - on 23rd February the government's proposed merger of Section 1 and 2 fi****ms will be debated in Parliament.
On the surface to the "outside" the merger seems to purely have public safety in mind
🌳What’s the difference between Section 1 and Section 2 fi****ms?
Section 1 fi****ms covers rifles and other high powered fi****ms including shotguns that can fire more than 3 cartridges before reloading.
Section 2 fi****ms are shotguns that can fire 3 or less shot cartridges before reloading and have a minimum of 24" barrels.
The difference lies in the fact that for a Section 1 fi****ms licence the holder has to be able to justify each firearm on that licence and is subject to more stringent control of storing ammunition. For a Section 2 licence the holder just needs to be able justify responsibly owning a shotgun.
🌳So why is it important that we have our say within this debate if the government are only concerned with public safety?
To hold either kind of firearm licence, applicants are still subjected to the SAME LEVEL of background, suitability and medical checks.
At the moment the 44 separate police licensing departments are responsible for these checks to be carried out correctly and in the UK where there have been horrific shotgun crimes the problems have been due to failures during these checks.
🌳Why would merging Section 1 and Section 2 licences cause an issue?
Time. Section 1 fi****ms require justification for each and every firearm owned it requires a lot more administrative time and therefore licences will be more difficult, time consuming and costly to deliver on. The police licensing departments are already at full capacity and having to add this additional pressure will cause delays and could potentially lead to errors. These financial and logistical demands will have massive effects on both gun traders, gun owners, gunsmiths, gamekeepers, shooting estates etc with consequential knock on effects on the general rural community and their environmental and conservation efforts associated with game shooting.
The has put forward a different proposal that would have more of a positive impact on public safety with regards to fi****ms.
Improving public safety is “not about alignment, but about how licensing is delivered”. The current process is outdated and has too much margin for error.
They propose a centralised fi****ms licensing body with a central digital database to allow real-time checking of licensing to reduce illegitimate and fraudulent firearm transactions and licensing. Could it also be accessed by GPs so that if there are mental health issues with a patient they can look up if they have a fi****ms certificate and put on an alert for action?
🌳So there is a lot of talk of the detriment to the shooting industry - and this needs to be taken seriously. Aside from the economical impact on Britain we are talking about endangering a highly skilled craft that has an integral part in British history and a sport that teaches its participants restraint, respect, manners and etiquette that are sadly lacking in today’s society. It is my belief that the government’s intention here is to attack a sport and an industry that they do not fully understand and do not wish to try to.
However, it is also a potential that rather than reducing the number of licences and fi****ms in the UK this could actually lead to an increase. For example, a country sportsperson may have a few different shotguns - their clay gun, their game gun, their semi-auto for wildfowling and maybe that antique side by side English made family heirloom that only comes out on fine days but hasn’t missed a beat in its 100 year existence. Each of these guns serve a unique purpose and has a place in the cabinet - instead of getting rid of any of these the applicant will be able to demonstrate a need and justify it. Well…while having to go through the motions for a full Section 1 fi****ms licence, might as well apply for a .22 rimfire for rabbits or target shooting as well - the government could end up with more fi****ms licence holders than ever and still an outdated unmanageable licensing system….i wonder if they have thought about this?
These are just my thoughts - please feel free to comment with yours
The government need to listen to the countryside on this one. Sign the petition here: http://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/750236 and please write to your local MP so we can have our say.