Cattle fattening

Cattle fattening Beef cattle are cattle raised for meat production (as distinguished from dairy cattle, used for milk Where Can I Get Information? commercial). terminal breeds.

Each beef cattle enterprise has different resources: land, labor, capital, feed and management. To raise beef cattle profitably, you must manage these resources to maximize returns. Below are some guidelines to make this enterprise successful. A large amount of information is available on beef production through books and magazines. With the electronic age, you can also access information over the

internet from many universities and in particular, their Extension systems. For copies of printed information, you can also visit your local Extension Office. Other suggestions for developing a working knowledge of beef production are to join a local beef producers organization and visit with other local producers. Most producers are more than happy to share their knowledge. Be sure to visit their operations also for ideas on handling, management, and breeds. Another important person to gain knowledge from is your veterinarian. Discuss health concerns and management suggestions with your vet. What Type of Cattle Should I Raise? Normally, the sole source of your income from a beef operation will come from the calves produced each year. So, it is important that your cows produce a calf at least every 12 months. Be conscious of selecting as well as keeping good productive cows who will produce a calf every year without assistance, maintain their body condition without becoming overly thin or fat, and raise a calf with an average weaning weight that meets your goals. Other considerations to make when choosing cows are the breed and what type of operation (purebred vs. Breeds of Beef Cattle
Beef cattle are generally divided into two different groups: maternal breeds vs. Generally, maternal breeds are known for their milk production and mothering ability while terminal breeds are known for their growth and meat producing ability. As with anything in life, there are some exceptions to this rule. Some breeds are also known as dual purpose breeds because they combine muscling for meat production with excellent maternal characteristics. For more information on breeds of beef cattle, visit the Oklahoma State Beef Breeds Directory. Crossbreeding can help you to combine the best attributes of individual breeds into one package. Choose traits that are important to you and then seek a breed or a crossbred that exhibits those traits. Type of Operation
Before you get started in the beef business, you will need to ask yourself what type of operation you would like to run. Some of the typical options are cow/calf, backgrounding feeder calves, or feedlot. The cow/calf producer keeps a herd of cows to produce calves. The backgrounder buys weaned calves and turns them out on pastures until they reach 800 to 900 pounds. The feedlot operator purchases weaned calves or backgrounded calves and feeds them to market weight. If you choose to become a cow/calf operation, you will also need to decide whether you would like to run a purebred or a commercial operation. A purebred operation typically raises cattle of one breed. Often a purebred operation will have all registered cattle that can also be sold through purebred sales. A commercial operation may have unregistered purebred cattle or they may have crossbred cattle. Commercial producers can have the benefit of hybrid vigor which is simply the ability of crossbred offspring to increase in productivity over the average of the breeds that were part of the cross. This means that a crossbred calf could grow faster and thus weigh more at a certain age than either of its parents. Many purebred sales are held across the country throughout the year. Sales may offer only one breed or they may offer a large variety of breeds for sale. Also, you may want to become familiar with trends in the beef industry when choosing breeding stock. Choose bulls that will compliment the outstanding traits in your cows and improve their weaknesses. Cows for a commercial operation can be bought at a purebred sale and then used in a crossbreeding program or you can contact individual producers to buy larger numbers of heifers that could be purebreds or crossbreds. Another option is to buy animals through an auction barn. Be aware however, that you are more likely to buy problem cattle through an auction barn. Unless a producer sells all his calves through the auction, he may be selling only cull calves. Beef producers who purchase calves to background or place in a feedlot often purchase calves directly from a cow/calf operator. They may also purchase calves through feeder calf sales. Most buyers will pay more for calves that have been weaned, dewormed and vaccinated because the likelihood of calves getting sick is greatly reduced. Beef Operation Management
Management of a beef operation depends largely on the interests of the producer as well as the resources available such as land, feed, facilities, and others. Management systems will vary depending on the climate. Operations that have hard winters will want to provide access to shelter for the cows during extremely cold weather and during periods of cold rain. Facilities
Facilities for beef operations will vary from fencing to barns, sheds or shelters. Again, facility requirements will depend on whether your operation runs cattle only through the summer months or all year. Any operation should have some type of handling system that allows a producer to easily catch and restrain an animal for routine health care procedures. The handling system should include a corral system with a chute that leads to a head-gate. A beef facility may also need feeding facilities. This could be as simple as a mineral feeder for a backgrounding operation. Or, it may include barns and grain and hay feeders for the cow/calf operation. In addition, a feedlot operation will need to account for adequate bunk or feeder space for the number of animals that are being fed. A general rule of thumb for feeder space is to provide 18 to 22 inches for calves up to 600 pounds, 22 to 26 inches per head for calves 600 pounds to market weight, 26 to 30 inches per head for mature cows, and 14 to 18 inches per head for calves. If you have feed available at all times, these sizes can be decreased.

20/10/2022

Cattle fattening is a livestock production practice that reduces animal movements thereby fattening cattle more quickly. Larger animals can be sold for more money on the market as they yield more meat.
Cattle fattening farming business is a very profitable business, and many people are making money all over the world by doing cattle livestock farming business.
Cattle fattening involves the feeding of beef cattle with a protein balanced, high-energy diet for a period of about 90 days or more under confinement to increase live weights and improve degree of finish and thus obtain better grades at the abattoir.
To build a successful, sustainable cattle fattening business, you require sufficient knowledge of how to efficiently do cattle pen fattening i.e. cattle fattening techniques, good management skills, and a good business plan.

Behavioral AnalysisIn accordance with Endres et al. (19), each behavior was assumed to persist for the entire sample int...
20/10/2022

Behavioral Analysis
In accordance with Endres et al. (19), each behavior was assumed to persist for the entire sample interval. Therefore, the duration of each performed behavioral pattern was calculated by multiplying the number of the correspondent sample intervals with 2 or 10. For the behavioral observations at herd level, the percentage of animals performing each behavior was averaged for each interval for all days. To assess behavioral synchronization the percentage of time a certain number of animals spent feeding or lying was averaged for all groups and days. The variables calculated per animal at individual level are listed in Table 4. Mean and SD of the percentage of time spent feeding and lying per 18.5 h-period were calculated for each single animal for all days. Furthermore, the mean bout length and the mean number of bouts per 18.5 h-period were determined. After each observed feed delivery, the position of each animal within the order of animals feeding after feed delivery was determined. Furthermore, for each single animal, the percentage of feed deliveries with following feeding behavior was calculated.

Behavioral ObservationsBehavioral observations were performed by analyzing video recordings. The animals were videotaped...
20/10/2022

Behavioral Observations
Behavioral observations were performed by analyzing video recordings. The animals were videotaped with two video cameras (EQ900F, EverFocus Electronics Corporation, Taipei, Taiwan) and an eight-channel hybrid recorder (AXR-108, Monacor International GmbH & Co. KG, Bremen, Germany). The cameras were located above the pens covering two full pens each. Individual animals were identified and listed by the color and patterns of their fur.
The video analyses were performed using the program Interact (Version 17.0.1.2, Mangold International GmbH, Arnstorf, Germany) for observational research. For the group-based evaluation, the activity of the animals was observed for 48 h per OP using a scan-sampling-technique (17). In intervals of 2 min from 4:00 to 23:30 h and 10 min during the night (23:30–4:00 h), the number of animals feeding and lying was recorded. At an individual level, the behavior of all animals was scanned at intervals of 10 min from 4:00 to 22:30 h on 3 consecutive days per OP using a combination of scan sampling and focal animal sampling . The 10 min-interval was chosen in accordance with Mitlohner et al and Endres et al. The recorded and analyzed behavior patterns were feeding and lying. Lying included bulls that were observed in sternal as well as in total lateral recumbency from the end of the lying-down movement until the end of the standing-up movement. An animal was considered to be feeding when its head was completely past the feed rail and above the feed while ingesting the feed.

Body Condition and Health ScoringThe data acquisition began when the final groups had existed for at least 3 weeks. It w...
20/10/2022

Body Condition and Health Scoring
The data acquisition began when the final groups had existed for at least 3 weeks. It was performed during three OP at an average of 338, 407, and 476 days of age, respectively (approximately at an age of 11, 14, and 16 months, respectively). The OP was defined as a 4 day-period of data acquisition, beginning with body condition and health scoring on the first day and continuing with 3 days of continuous video recording at the following 3 days. At the beginning of each OP, all individual animals were individually scored for body condition and health status by one trained observer. The bulls' body condition was assessed following the body condition score (BCS) system described by Edmonson et al. with scores ranging from 1 (emaciated condition) to 5 (obese condition) in steps of 0.5 . Bulls' health status was assessed considering the welfare criteria for health assessment listed in the Welfare Quality® assessment protocol for cattle. The analyzed criteria are listed in Table 3. In addition to observations during scoring, bulls' health was monitored by the farmer. In consultation with his farm veterinarian, he documented any pathological event that occurred during the fattening period as well as drug use.

The animals arrived on the farm at about 5 months of age (148 ± 11 days). In the following 3 months, they were assigned ...
20/10/2022

The animals arrived on the farm at about 5 months of age (148 ± 11 days). In the following 3 months, they were assigned to groups of 14 animals each according to their body weight. For the study, four groups of similar body weight were selected. These groups remained constant until the end of the fattening period. The only exception was group 3 from which one animal (animal 32) was removed after the first observation period (OP), explained below, due to reduced feeding and growth. Animals were slaughtered at an age of 558 ± 20 days and carcass weights were provided by the slaughterhouse.

Further positive effects of an increased feeding frequency are known from studies on dairy cattle regarding an increase ...
20/10/2022

Further positive effects of an increased feeding frequency are known from studies on dairy cattle regarding an increase in the time spent feeding as well as in dry matter intake
Furthermore, increasing feeding frequency led to decreased diurnal variation in ruminal pH possibly reducing the risk of subacute ruminal acidosis. However, all these results refer to dairy cattle and heifers, while currently no scientific studies at all exist concerning the influence of feeding frequency on behavior, health, or growth performance of fattening cattle. Nonetheless, the impact of feeding frequency is not only important regarding the suitability or benefits of an AFS for fattening cattle, but also concerning the current practice of feeding fattening cattle only once or twice per day. Therefore, the objective of the present study was to generally describe behavior and performance of fattening bulls fed at a high frequency, namely six times per day using an AFS.

Automatic feeding is gaining more and more importance in dairy cattle farming. Main reasons to install an automatic feed...
20/10/2022

Automatic feeding is gaining more and more importance in dairy cattle farming. Main reasons to install an automatic feeding system (AFS) are its contributions to a reduction in workload and working time as well as increasing flexibility. However, benefits of AFS are not restricted to management factors. Permitting an increasing feeding frequency without increasing costs or workload they also offer possibilities to positively influence behavior, productivity and health of cattle
Up to now, AFS have been rarely used in housing systems for fattening cattle, despite their advantages being transferable from dairy to fattening cattle. Fattening cattle are commonly fed twice per day, in the morning and in the evening or even only once in the morning, using an ad libitum feeding regimen. On pasture, cattle spend about 10–12 h per day grazing, divided into several meals spread out from dusk to dawn (6). The feeding duration of housed cattle is reduced to 4–7 h per day, but feeding is still divided into 6–12 daily meals spread out over the daylight period (6, 7). As cattle are selective feeders while consuming conserved feed, feed composition, palatability and, therefore, possibly also feed quality is likely to decline with increasing time after feed delivery. This could have detrimental effects on nutrition, as cattle tend to spread out their feeding behavior over the course of the day. The pre-selected ration they receive with increasing time after feeding may not fulfill their nutrient requirements. An increasing frequency of feed deliveries spread out across the day could contribute to ensuring not only constant feed availability but also constant feed quality. Using an AFS allows such a feed delivery pattern without increasing workload for farmers.

The usage of automatic feeding systems (AFS) in cattle offers multiple advantages, mostly due to the possibility of an i...
20/10/2022

The usage of automatic feeding systems (AFS) in cattle offers multiple advantages, mostly due to the possibility of an increased feeding frequency. While it is gaining more and more importance in dairy farming, there is still a lack of experience and scientific knowledge regarding its use in fattening cattle. The aim of this study was to describe the behavior of 56 Simmental bulls fed with an AFS six times daily a total mixed ration. The animals arrived at the farm with an average age of 148 ± 11 days. They were housed in four straw-bedded pens in groups of 14 animals each. Their average slaughter age was 558 ± 20 days. Behavioral observations were made during three observation periods (OP) at an average of 11, 14, and 16 months of age. Using scan sampling, feeding, and lying behavior of all animals and the order of bulls feeding after feed delivery were recorded. Furthermore, body condition and health status were monitored and complemented with the carcass weights. Body condition, health status, and carcass weights of the bulls were found to be satisfactory: Mean body condition score increased from 2.8 ± 0.3 in OP1 to 3.0 ± 0.1 in OP3 and mean carcass weight was 432.71 ± 40.82 kg. No severe health problems occurred. The feeding activity of the bulls was spread out over the course of the day with peaks in the afternoon and evening. Percentages of bulls feeding per pen never exceeded 20%, animals feeding mostly alone (during 28.04 ± 2.15% of total observation time) or in groups of two to three (16.61 ± 2.00% and 6.74 ± 1.90%). The order of bulls feeding after feed delivery varied indicating that all animals had similar access to fresh feed. These results emphasize the importance of constant feed availability and quality at any time of the day, thus indicating the ability of an AFS with six daily feedings to ensure such a consistency.

Address

Adama
1000

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Cattle fattening posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Cattle fattening:

Share

Category