08/27/2025
The question wasn’t complicated, but it left a noticeable pause in the room.
“If a horse is lame in the ring, who is responsible for making sure it doesn’t continue to show?”
At a recent Plaidcast In Person event, longtime judge, trainer, and international clinician Geoff Case didn’t hesitate with his answer: “In my view, the buck stops with the actual horsemen.”
But the conversation didn’t end there, because in today’s horse show landscape, responsibility for horse welfare isn’t always so clearly assigned. From class limits and unsound horses to legal concerns and ring dynamics, Case and other panelists peeled back the layers of a growing dilemma in modern competition: who actually protects the horse?
Judges are trained to observe. To reward precision. To penalize error. And when necessary, to step in when something looks wrong. But when it comes to a horse showing obvious lameness, Case admitted the reality is murky.
“The truth is, a horse is either sound or it’s not. It’s not a spectrum,” he said. “But the minute you call a horse lame, there can be consequences. Legal ones.”
It’s happened before. At major events like Pony Finals and the Hampton Classic, judges have been sued after calling a horse unsound and eliminating it from competition. In those situations, even if the decision is correct, the cost of defending it can be tens of thousands of dollars.
That’s a huge burden for someone working a freelance job in a small judging booth, especially when they may not feel protected by horse show management or the governing body. “The stewards feel like the federations in general don’t have the backs of the stewards enough,” Case explained. “So the judge is often the last line of defense.”
By current USEF protocol, if a horse appears unsound, the responsibility begins with the schooling supervisor. That person should report the issue to the steward, who communicates with management and the judge. But according to Case?
“That has never happened in my experience.”
Instead, it often falls on the judge in the ring who must weigh the ethics of eliminating a potentially lame horse against the legal and professional fallout that might follow. And if they’re watching a child or adult amateur pilot an unsound horse under the direction of a trainer?
“It’s horribly embarrassing for them,” Case said. “They’re out there to have fun. They may not even realize anything’s wrong.”
Interestingly, Case said he feels more supported when penalizing unsafe riding than when calling a horse unsound.
“When it’s an obvious danger, like a horse that’s way too fresh or a rider clearly overmounted, it’s easier to justify intervention,” he explained. “That is fairly well received.”
But lameness remains a gray area. And it’s not just about ethics or fear of lawsuits. It’s about structure. The way horse shows are currently set up doesn’t always give officials the backing they need to act swiftly or definitively.
🔗 Continue reading the discussion at https://www.theplaidhorse.com/2025/08/27/where-does-the-buck-stop-soundness-class-limits-and-the-accountability-gap-in-horse-shows/
📸 Photo © Heather N. Photography