05/20/2026
We truly think this needs to be looked at and changed as these vets are important to each and every one of us!π¨ What are other Canadian provinces doing to address livestock veterinary shortages? π¨
Across Canada, governments are recognizing veterinary shortages as a threat to:
π Livestock health
π½οΈ Food security
π¦ Disease surveillance
π¨ Emergency response
πΎ Rural communities
π§ͺ Diagnostic capacity
π¨βπ©βπ§βπ¦ Public health
β¦and they are INVESTING in solutions.
Meanwhile, New Brunswickβs current plan is to phase out Provincial Veterinary Services over 3 years, including ending field veterinarian positions by March 2027.
Hereβs what other provinces are doing:
ββββββββββββββ
π§π¨ British Columbia
π° $1.4M Recruitment & Retention Program
π° $300K Veterinary Student Placement Program
Supports:
βοΈ Hiring bonuses
βοΈ Herd health support
βοΈ Recruitment expenses
βοΈ Telemedicine
βοΈ Student placements
βοΈ Locum support
π Focus: Recruitment β’ Retention β’ Rural access
ββββββββββββββ
π¦π± Alberta
π° $68.5M Veterinary Learning Commons
π° $9.5M / 3 years Veterinary diagnostic lab support
π° $250K Recruitment & retention pilot
π Focus: Education β’ Diagnostics β’ Rural recruitment β’ Disease response
ββββββββββββββ
π΄π³ Ontario
π° $14.7M over 2 years
Supporting:
βοΈ Veterinary education
βοΈ Increased training capacity
βοΈ Rural & livestock shortages
π° Up to $5M potential Veterinary Incentive Program
π° $4M Livestock Veterinary Innovation Initiative
Supporting:
βοΈ Telemedicine
βοΈ Rural veterinary access
βοΈ Workforce retention
π Ontarioβs approach: Building veterinary systems
ββββββββββββββ
π²π§ Manitoba
π° $134M+ over 5 years
β‘οΈ Approx. $26.8M/year
Additional investments:
π° $8.3M workforce development
π° $2M Rural Veterinary Service Districts
π° >$1M Northern & remote veterinary care
π° ~$9.6β10.6M/year
Animal Health & Welfare budget
Supporting:
βοΈ Diagnostics
βοΈ Disease surveillance
βοΈ Welfare enforcement
βοΈ Preparedness
π Manitobaβs approach: Investment & expansion
ββββββββββββββ
π³πΈ Nova Scotia
π° ~$50.8M over 5 years
β‘οΈ Approx. $10.16M/year
Supporting:
βοΈ Veterinary education
βοΈ Retention initiatives
βοΈ Disease surveillance
βοΈ Herd health programs
βοΈ Emergency response
π Nova Scotiaβs approach: Investment & support
ββββββββββββββ
πΈπ° Saskatchewan
π° $13.2M in 2024β25
Supporting:
βοΈ Veterinary education
βοΈ Rural recruitment
βοΈ Workforce expansion
Expanded seats:
π 20 β 25
Additional:
π° $687K
Veterinary workforce development
π° Up to $20K
Loan forgiveness
π Saskatchewanβs approach: Building workforce capacity
ββββββββββββββ
πΎπΉ Yukon
π° Veterinary Services Program
β‘οΈ Up to $1K per premises annually
Supporting:
βοΈ Diagnostics
βοΈ Consultations
βοΈ Travel costs
βοΈ Farm calls
Government-supported capacity also includes:
βοΈ Disease surveillance
βοΈ Emergency response
βοΈ Biosecurity
βοΈ Producer support
π Yukonβs approach: Maintaining veterinary capacity
ββββββββββββββ
πΆπ¨ Quebec
π° $101M investment
Supporting:
βοΈ Veterinary infrastructure
βοΈ Expanded education
βοΈ Regional training
βοΈ Public animal health
Added:
π 25 veterinary seats
Increasing capacity to:
β‘οΈ 121 veterinary students/year
π Quebecβs approach: Major investment & expansion
ββββββββββββββ
π³π± Newfoundland & Labrador
Unlike most provinces, Newfoundland continues direct government-operated livestock veterinary services.
π° ~$4.37M annual Animal Health budget (2024β25)
Supporting:
βοΈ Government veterinary services
βοΈ 24-hour emergency veterinary response
βοΈ Veterinary pharmacy services
βοΈ Disease surveillance
βοΈ Diagnostics
βοΈ Food safety programs
βοΈ Animal welfare
βοΈ Chief Veterinary Officer functions
βοΈ Preparedness & outbreak response
Additional investment:
π° $500K
Animal Health Laboratory equipment upgrades
Supporting:
βοΈ Diagnostic testing
βοΈ Food safety
βοΈ Laboratory capacity
π Key takeaway:
Newfoundland continues direct government investment in veterinary capacity, rather than eliminating services.
Interesting comparison:
β‘οΈ Newfoundland maintains government veterinary services with annual spending in a similar range to the ~$4M shortfall cited in New Brunswick.
ββββββββββββββ
π³π§ New Brunswick
Current plan:
β Phase out Provincial Veterinary Services over 3 years
β End field veterinarian positions by March 2027
Government has pointed to approximately:
β ~$4M shortfall
Yet across Canada, provinces are investing millions β and in some cases hundreds of millions β into veterinary systems.
ββββββββββββββ
π The argument is NOT that New Brunswickβs Provincial Veterinary Services are perfect.
The argument is:
βοΈ The model has value
βοΈ The infrastructure already exists
βοΈ The expertise already exists
βοΈ The veterinarians already exist
βοΈ Stakeholders have repeatedly indicated willingness to pay increased fees to help bridge funding shortfalls
βοΈ Stakeholders have indicated willingness to work collaboratively toward solutions
Because these services protect:
π Livestock health
π₯ Food production
π¦ Disease surveillance
π¨ Emergency response
πΎ Rural communities
π§ͺ Diagnostics
π½οΈ Food security
π¨βπ©βπ§βπ¦ Public health
ββββββββββββββ
π’ The question becomes:
If stakeholders are willing to help bridge funding gapsβ¦
If shortages of large-animal veterinarians already existβ¦
If experienced veterinarians are beginning to leaveβ¦
If other provinces are investing heavily to strengthen veterinary systemsβ¦
Why dismantle an existing model instead of improving it?
Perhaps the answer is:
β‘οΈ Better management
β‘οΈ Recruitment & retention strategies
β‘οΈ Transparent planning
β‘οΈ Genuine collaboration with stakeholders
β‘οΈ Sustainable funding solutions
β‘οΈ Modernizing how New Brunswick manages and supports Provincial Veterinary Services β not reducing veterinary capacity
β Keep what works. Improve what doesnβt. Build for the future. β
Because once veterinary capacity is lost, rebuilding it may cost far more than preserving it.