29/08/2026
๐ฅ๐๐๐๐ ๐๐ง๐ข๐ฉ๐ฉ๐๐ญ!๐ด ๐๐จ๐ฌ๐ญ-๐๐ก๐๐ฐ ๐๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ญ๐ข๐ฅ๐ข๐ญ๐ฒ ๐๐จ๐ฆ๐ฉ๐๐ซ๐ข๐ง๐ ๐๐ฎ๐ญ๐จ๐ฆ๐๐ญ๐๐ ๐
๐ซ๐๐๐ณ๐๐ซ ๐ฏ๐ฌ. ๐๐ญ๐ฒ๐ซ๐จ๐๐จ๐๐ฆ ๐๐จ๐ฑ ๐๐๐ซ๐จ๐ฌ๐ฌ ๐๐ฎ๐ฅ๐ญ๐ข๐ฉ๐ฅ๐ ๐๐ซ๐ฒ๐จ๐ฉ๐ซ๐จ๐ญ๐๐๐ญ๐๐ง๐ญ๐ฌ
Study Design:
โข 4 stallions (ages 4โ20); 4 semen collections each
โข Four cryoprotectant groups tested:
โข Glycerol + methylformamide (2% + 1%)
โข Ethylene glycol + methylformamide (2.5% + 2.5%)
โข Glycerol + methylformamide (2.5% + 2.5%)
โข Standard commercial control extender
โข Two freezing methods per group: isothermal styrofoam box & automated computer-controlled freezer
โข Post-thaw assessment: total motility, progressive motility, rapid s***m percentage, average path velocity, straight-line velocity, & curvilinear velocity
Key Results:
โข No significant differences in total motility, progressive motility, rapid s***m percentage, or average path velocity across groups or methods
โข Straight-line velocity was lower in the ethylene glycol group using the box versus the control box & glycerol/methylformamide machine groups
โข Curvilinear velocity was highest in the standard control box protocol, outperforming all other group/method combinations
Conclusions:
โข When the automated freezing machine vs. Styrofoam box are compared, both freezing methods are effective; all cryoprotectant combinations produced acceptable post-thaw motility
โข The automated machine offers greater process consistency by eliminating external variables such as nitrogen level & straw quantity
โข Individual cryoprotectant combinations may influence velocity parameters even when primary motility metrics remain comparable
(Canuto LEF, Trinque CM, Cavalero TMS, Frasson MA, de Zutter BM, Zanlorenzi Silva LP, Baby MEA, Freitas-Dell'Aqua CP, Alvarenga MA, Papa FO. 2025. Post-thaw semen motility in different cryoprotectants after freezing in a Cryogenยฎ automatic freezer compared to an isothermal box. JEVS 145:105272 - https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0737080624002788)