Farmers secrets (2025)

26/07/2025

Fulvic Acid: The Farmer's Silent Partner in Soil Regeneration and Yield Improvement

By Tendai L Sachiti

In the journey to achieve regenerative agriculture and reduce our reliance on synthetic inputs, many farmers are rediscovering the incredible power of fulvic acid. Though small in molecular size, its effect on the soil, plants, and ultimately the harvest is transformative. This article dives deeper into what fulvic acid is, its benefits to farmers, its role in CEC (Cation Exchange Capacity) improvement, and how it can change the game for heavy feeder crops like tomatoes.

What is Fulvic Acid?

Fulvic acid is a low-molecular-weight organic acid that forms naturally as plant and microbial matter breaks down in the soil. It is one of the most active components of humus, the rich dark matter that gives fertile soil its life-giving properties.

Unlike synthetic chemicals, fulvic acid is:

Water-soluble at all pH levels

Able to pass through plant cell walls, making it highly bioavailable

Rich in oxygen and functional groups that allow it to bind and carry nutrients

Benefits of Fulvic Acid to the Farmer

1. Enhanced Nutrient Uptake
Fulvic acid acts like a shuttle, chelating nutrients (especially cations like Ca²⁺, Mg²⁺, Fe²⁺, K⁺) and delivering them directly to plant roots and into cells. This means less fertilizer waste and more effective feeding.

2. Increased Fertilizer Efficiency
When used with fertilizers—especially ammonium nitrate and micronutrients—fulvic acid improves their solubility and uptake. Farmers can reduce fertilizer rates while maintaining or even increasing yield.

3. Improved Root Growth
It stimulates root elongation and branching, helping plants access deeper moisture and nutrients.

4. Boosted Microbial Life
Fulvic acid is a food source for beneficial microbes and helps them thrive. Healthy microbial populations improve nutrient cycling and disease suppression.

5. Stress Resistance
Crops become more resilient to drought, salinity, disease, and temperature extremes.

🔍 What is CEC and Why Does It Matter?

CEC (Cation Exchange Capacity) is a measure of how well your soil can hold and exchange positively charged nutrients. It's measured in meq/100g (milliequivalents per 100 grams of soil).

CEC Value Soil Type Nutrient-Holding Capacity

3–5 Very low (sandy soils) Poor; nutrients leach easily
6–10 Low Needs organic matter improvement
11–20 Moderate Good for most crops
20+ High (clayey soils) Excellent nutrient retention

Low CEC soils struggle to hold onto nutrients, leading to leaching and fertilizer inefficiency. These soils often appear tired, dry out quickly, and grow crops with poor vigor.

How Fulvic Acid Improves CEC and Soil Health

Binds with clay particles and organic matter, increasing the soil’s negative charge to hold more nutrient cations.

Delivers chelated nutrients more efficiently to roots.

Stimulates microbial activity, which helps convert organic matter into humus—raising long-term CEC.

Improves root-soil contact and enhances nutrient transport.

The more organic matter and active substances like fulvic acid present in soil, the higher its CEC and the better its nutrient-holding power.

Heavy Feeder Focus: Tomatoes

Tomatoes are an ideal example of a heavy feeder crop that thrives with fulvic acid support. They require high levels of nitrogen, potassium, calcium, and magnesium—nutrients that fulvic acid helps mobilize and deliver.

Quick Benefits in Tomato Production:

Stronger, deeper roots within 10–14 days

Darker, healthier foliage due to increased chlorophyll

More flowers and better fruit set

Reduced blossom end rot (linked to improved calcium availability)

Better drought tolerance due to enhanced nutrient uptake and root structure

Expected Yield Improvement:
Under well-managed conditions (with mulch, compost, and biochar):

Baseline yield: 20–25 tons/ha

With fulvic acid + amendments: 30–35+ tons/ha

General Guide to Fulvic Acid Application

Method Application Rate Frequency

Soil drench 3–5 ml/L Every 2–3 weeks
Foliar spray 1–2 ml/L Key stages: vegetative, pre-flowering, fruit set
Fertigation 2–3 L/ha Monthly or with fert feeds

Combine With:

Ammonium nitrate (for fast nitrogen boost)

Micronutrient sprays (zinc, iron, boron)

Compost teas or EM solutions

♻️ Supportive Practices to Maximize Fulvic Acid Benefits

1. Mulching

Retains moisture

Reduces nutrient evaporation

Supports fungal and bacterial networks

2. Compost

Adds stable organic matter, raising CEC

Provides a slow-release nutrient base

3. Biochar

High CEC material

Soaks and stores fulvic-acid-bound nutrients

Best when charged with compost or fulvic tea

4. Green Manures & Cover Crops

Improve organic matter

Prevent nutrient leaching

Feed soil microbes

⏳ When Will Farmers See Changes?

7–14 days: Increased vigor, greener leaves, better water use

21–30 days: Enhanced root growth, flower and fruit development

1–2 seasons: Visible soil structure change, higher organic matter, improved yields

Final Thoughts

Fulvic acid is one of the most underutilized tools in regenerative farming. It not only makes the most of every fertilizer dollar, but also begins the natural restoration of soil health. Especially when combined with mulching, compost, and biochar, it brings the soil back to life and increases yield without relying heavily on synthetic inputs.

For small- and large-scale farmers alike, investing in fulvic acid is investing in the long-term fertility and sustainability of your land.

Written by Tendai L Sachiti
Regenerative Agriculture Advocate

14/07/2025

Is Chemicalisation a Big No in Regenerative Agriculture?

By Tendai L Sachiti

As the world leans toward sustainable food systems, regenerative agriculture is gaining traction — not as a trend, but as a necessary shift in how we relate to the land. But one controversial question persists:

“Can we use chemicals in regenerative agriculture, or must we reject them entirely?”

This question is not just theoretical. It sits at the core of practice, ethics, and markets — especially as more farmers seek green label certification, target eco-conscious consumers, and transition from chemically intensive farming systems.

Let’s explore this deeply — not just to draw lines, but to build understanding.

🌱 What Regenerative Agriculture Actually Means

Regenerative agriculture is not a fixed recipe. It’s a principle-driven system that focuses on restoring and enhancing the natural functions of ecosystems, especially in agricultural landscapes. It seeks to reverse degradation caused by extractive practices.

Core Principles:

1. Build soil health and organic matter

2. Maximize plant and microbial diversity

3. Keep soil covered and alive year-round

4. Minimize synthetic inputs

5. Integrate animals wisely

6. Enhance natural nutrient and water cycles

7. Support community and fair value chains

The key word is regenerate — meaning to repair, restore, and revive soil, water, biodiversity, and the social contract between farmers and consumers.

Understanding “Chemicalisation”

“Chemicalisation” refers to systemic dependency on synthetic agricultural chemicals — including fertilizers, pesticides, herbicides, fungicides, growth regulators, and preservatives.

These inputs, while initially useful for boosting yields, often lead to:

Soil microbial collapse

Residue accumulation in food and water

Pest resistance and secondary pest outbreaks

Nutrient imbalances and leaching

Farmer dependency and economic vulnerability

Regenerative agriculture is fundamentally opposed to this model — not because it’s anti-science, but because it’s pro-biology.

✅ The Role of Green Label Inputs: A Middle Path?

As regenerative agriculture matures, some inputs — often called green label chemicals or organic-approved inputs — are finding a carefully controlled place within regenerative systems, particularly during transition or in extreme cases.

These inputs are:

Derived from natural sources

Minimally processed

Biodegradable

Low risk to soil biota and beneficial insects

Listed by certifying bodies such as OMRI (USA), ECOCERT (Europe), NASAA (Australia), or local equivalents

Examples of Green Label Inputs:

Category Examples

Biopesticides Neem oil, pyrethrum, Bt (Bacillus thuringiensis), Beauveria bassiana, Metarhizium fungi
Fungicides Sulfur, potassium bicarbonate, copper sulfate (use restricted), baking soda
Fertilizers Fish emulsion, seaw**d extract, bone meal, rock phosphate, compost tea
Bio-stimulants Molasses brews, fermented plant juices, amino acid extracts, microbial inoculants
Herbicide Alternatives Vinegar-based sprays, clove oil, flame w**ding

🧭 When (and Why) Might These Inputs Be Used?

In ideal regenerative systems, inputs become obsolete because the ecosystem is self-regulating.

However, in real-world agriculture, especially where:

Soils are heavily degraded

Pest pressure is severe

Market demands are high

Certification is still in transition

…these inputs may be strategically and transparently used as a support system.

Best Practice Guidelines:

Use only inputs approved by your certifier or buyer

Apply based on thresholds, not schedules

Combine with biological strategies (e.g. companion planting, mulching)

Document usage to avoid disqualification during audits

Phase out over time as soil and crop systems strengthen

This is not a license to rely on inputs — it is a bridge to biological independence.

🌍 Global Certification and Consumer Markets

Whether you are farming in Rusape or Rwanda, Brazil or Bangladesh — access to premium green markets is growing. But so are the standards.

Most certification programs (e.g. EU Organic, USDA Organic, Soil Association, IFOAM, Demeter) follow some version of these principles:

No synthetic chemicals

No GMOs

Inputs must be traceable and compliant

Withdrawal periods required before certification approval

Even where green labels allow minimal use of certain inputs (e.g. copper or sulfur), they are strictly monitored and limited.

In other words: using green label chemicals is not a shortcut to certification — it’s a temporary tool under tight scrutiny.

📉 The Long-Term Goal: Chemical Independence

Regenerative farming is not about simply switching to “cleaner” chemicals. It’s about shifting the paradigm entirely:

From control → to cooperation

From prescription → to prevention

From artificial force → to biological intelligence

A true regenerative system relies on:

Rich, living soils that suppress disease and feed plants

Plant diversity that confuses pests and builds resilience

Microbes, fungi, and insects that form self-regulating ecosystems

Farmer observation and creativity, not dependency

In time, even green label inputs should become unnecessary.

📌 Summary: Is Chemicalisation a Big No?

Question Answer

Synthetic pesticides/fungicides/fertilizers ✅ Yes, a clear no in regenerative systems and green label standards
Green label / organic-approved inputs ⚠️ Conditionally yes, with restrictions and accountability
Routine chemical use ❌ Incompatible with regenerative goals
Strategic emergency use (during transition) ✅ Permitted, but must be documented and part of a phase-out strategy
Long-term vision 🌿 Biological self-reliance and soil-led health

Final Thought

Regenerative agriculture does not reject all inputs — it rejects dependency.

It challenges us to ask:

“Is this input regenerating life or suppressing it?”

“Will my soil be healthier next season — or more dependent?”

“Can I explain this choice to a consumer who trusts me?”

Green label inputs may have a place — but only as part of a bigger plan to exit the chemical mindset entirely. Not because chemicals are evil, but because biology is better.

29/04/2025

Azolla: The Tiny Water Plant That Can Help Farmers Regenerate the Land
By Tendai L Sachiti

In farming, we often search for big, expensive solutions to improve our soil, reduce costs, and boost production. But sometimes, the answer lies in something very small and simple — like Azolla, a floating water plant that’s making waves in regenerative agriculture.

What is Azolla?

Azolla (pronounced "uh-ZOL-uh") is a tiny green fern that grows on the surface of still water — in ponds, trays, or irrigation canals. It’s not just any plant. It works hand-in-hand with a special bacteria called Anabaena, which lives inside its leaves. This bacteria can take nitrogen from the air and turn it into natural fertilizer — something no ordinary plant can do on its own.

In short, Azolla feeds itself, and in doing so, it can feed your soil, your animals, and even help you save money.

Why Azolla is So Useful in Regenerative Agriculture

1. It Replaces Expensive Fertilizers

Azolla naturally produces nitrogen, one of the most important nutrients plants need to grow. Farmers who grow Azolla and mix it into their soil can reduce or completely stop buying chemical nitrogen fertilizers. That means fewer chemicals, lower costs, and healthier soil over time.

2. It Makes the Soil Better

When Azolla breaks down, it adds organic matter to the soil — like compost. This:

Feeds the helpful microbes in your soil.

Makes the soil hold water better.

Helps crops grow stronger and faster.

So instead of killing the soil with chemicals, Azolla helps bring it back to life.

3. It’s Free Animal Feed

Azolla is packed with protein (25–30%), minerals (like calcium and iron), and vitamins. You can mix it into the feed for:

Chickens (they love it!)

Goats and sheep

Cows and pigs

Rabbits and fish

Many farmers have cut down their feed bills just by adding fresh Azolla to their animals’ diets every day.

4. It Saves Water and Stops Weeds

When Azolla covers the surface of a pond or irrigation canal, it acts like a shade. This:

Keeps water from evaporating in the hot sun.

Stops w**ds from growing underneath.

Keeps the water cool and fresh.

In places where every drop of water counts, Azolla is a smart addition to the farm.

5. It Cleans Dirty Water

Azolla is a natural cleaner. It absorbs things like:

Excess nutrients from animal waste or fertilizers.

Harmful metals like lead or arsenic from polluted water.

That means it can help clean your fishpond, canal, or water tank — all while growing more Azolla.

6. It Fights Climate Change

Because it grows so fast (it can double its weight in just 3–5 days), Azolla pulls a lot of carbon dioxide out of the air. If farmers harvest and compost it regularly, it helps lock carbon into the soil — reducing greenhouse gases and fighting global warming in a natural way.

How Can You Grow Azolla?

You don’t need fancy tools. To grow Azolla, you need:

A shallow water tank or pit (even an old bathtub or basin works).

A little bit of cow dung or chicken droppings to get it started.

A warm, partly shaded area.

Once it takes off, you can harvest Azolla every day. It grows fast — and keeps on giving.

Final Thoughts

Azolla may look like just a small green w**d floating on water — but it’s a powerful tool for any farmer who wants to restore the land, grow healthy crops, feed animals naturally, and spend less money.

In regenerative agriculture, we say "work with nature, not against it." Azolla is nature’s quiet helper, offering real solutions — especially for smallholder and organic farmers.

So the next time you see a patch of green floating on a pond, take a second look. It might just be the future of farming.

22/04/2025

The Forgotten Link: How Regenerative Agriculture Can Restore Nutrient Density in Our Food

written by Tendai L Sachiti

Have you ever eaten a tomato that tasted like water? Or wondered why vegetables from your grandmother’s garden seemed richer, sweeter, more alive than what we buy today?

You're not imagining it.
Science now confirms what our taste buds and instincts have whispered for years—our food is losing its nutritional soul.
And it’s not just about flavor. It's about life itself—the minerals, antioxidants, and compounds that build our bodies, fuel our immunity, and even influence our emotions.

But here’s the hopeful part: we can reverse this decline. And the answer lies beneath our feet.

The Decline of Nutrients in Modern Food

Since the rise of industrial agriculture, we've focused on feeding the world with quantity, not quality. We've pushed plants to grow faster, bigger, and more uniform—often in soils stripped of life.

Multiple studies across the UK, US, and Africa show that over the last 50–70 years, levels of calcium, magnesium, iron, and vitamins in common fruits and vegetables have dropped by as much as 40–70%.
Modern wheat, for example, contains far less zinc and protein than its ancestors.

But why?

Because when soil is treated like a dead medium—just a place to pour synthetic fertilizers and extract yield—it loses its biological richness. The soil microbiome, that hidden universe of fungi, bacteria, and tiny insects, dies. And with it dies the invisible web that delivers nutrients to plants... and then to us.

Soil Health = Human Health

Regenerative agriculture doesn’t just aim to produce food—it seeks to heal ecosystems. It sees the farm as a living organism, where everything is connected: the soil, the plants, the animals, the farmer, and the eater.

When we restore the soil—through composting, cover cropping, diverse plant species, and reduced tillage—we also restore the nutrient pathways that have been severed.

Think of a carrot grown in healthy, living soil. Its roots explore a universe of minerals, aided by fungi that act like tiny postmen, delivering phosphorus, potassium, and rare trace elements. That carrot becomes more than food—it becomes medicine.

New Discoveries: Soil Microbes and the Human Gut

Here’s where it gets even more fascinating. Scientists are now discovering that the soil microbiome and the human gut microbiome are mirrors of each other. The health of one reflects the health of the other.

In simple terms: you are not just what you eat. You are what your food eats.

When we eat food grown in lifeless soil, our guts suffer. Chronic diseases, mood disorders, and weakened immunity are increasingly being linked to the decline in food quality—and by extension, soil quality.

Regenerative agriculture offers a new paradigm: food as nourishment for the whole being, not just calories for survival.

A Global Awakening

From India to Kenya, from Australia to Brazil, farmers are beginning to measure food not just by yield, but by nutrient density. Devices now exist to scan food and measure its vitamin and mineral content. Some regenerative farms are even earning premiums by proving their food is more nourishing.

In Zimbabwe, where many still grow food on small plots, this movement has revolutionary potential. Imagine a village where the soil is alive, the vegetables are rich in iron and vitamin A, and malnutrition fades not because of supplements—but because the food itself heals.

Questions for You, Reader

What if the cure for many of our modern diseases isn’t in the pharmacy—but in the way we farm?

What would it mean to treat soil like a sacred partner, not just a resource?

Are we feeding ourselves, or are we slowly starving in abundance?

Let’s reawaken our respect for the soil. Let’s relearn the forgotten link between the health of the land and the health of our people.

The future of nutrition lies in the soil and it starts with us

written by Tendai L Sachiti

19/03/2025

Biochar: A Game-Changer for Small-Scale Regenerative Farming

By Tendai L Sachiti

Have you ever struggled with soil that dries out too fast, loses nutrients quickly, or simply doesn’t produce as much as it used to? Many small-scale farmers in Zimbabwe face these challenges, but what if there was a simple, low-cost solution that could improve your soil, boost your yields, and even help fight climate change?

That solution is biochar—a powerful soil amendment made by burning organic materials like maize stalks, wood chips, or peanut shells in a low-oxygen environment. This process locks carbon into the soil, improves water retention, and provides a long-term home for beneficial microbes.

Why Should You Care About Biochar?

Biochar isn’t just some fancy scientific idea. It has been used for centuries in places like the Amazon, where ancient farmers created Terra Preta—rich, black soils that remain fertile even today! Imagine having soil that improves over time instead of degrading.

Here’s what biochar can do for your farm or garden:
✅ Increases soil fertility – It holds onto nutrients and releases them slowly.
✅ Improves water retention – Great for dry regions, helping plants survive drought.
✅ Boosts soil microbes – Provides a home for beneficial bacteria and fungi.
✅ Reduces soil acidity – Helps balance soil pH naturally.
✅ Traps carbon in the soil – Helps fight climate change while improving your yields.

How to Make Biochar at Home (Simple Method)

You don’t need expensive equipment! Here’s an easy way to make biochar using a simple pit method:

What you need:
✔ Dry organic materials (maize stalks, sawdust, wood chips, peanut shells, etc.)
✔ A shovel and a small pit (about 50cm deep)
✔ Matches or a lighter
✔ Water or soil (to stop the fire)

Steps:
1️⃣ Dig a small pit in a safe, open space.
2️⃣ Fill it with dry organic materials.
3️⃣ Light the fire and let it burn until the material turns black, but not to ash!
4️⃣ Once it turns black, cover it with soil or sprinkle water to stop the fire.
5️⃣ Let it cool, crush it into small pieces, and mix it with compost or manure before applying to your soil.

Does It Really Work? Here’s Proof!

A small-scale farmer in Mutare added biochar to her vegetable garden and saw a 30% increase in her tomato and cabbage yields in just two seasons! Her soil retained more moisture, and she used less fertilizer than before.

What’s Your Experience?

If you’ve tried biochar before, how did it work for you? Did you notice any changes in your soil or crop yields? We’d love to hear your story! Share your experience in the comments.

– Tendai L Sachiti

12/03/2025

Regenerative Agriculture as a Return to Nature: Cultivating Harmony or Controlling Chaos?

By Tendai L Sachiti

Introduction: The Paradox of Regeneration

Regenerative agriculture is often portrayed as a return to nature—a way of healing the land, restoring soil health, and working in harmony with natural systems. It presents itself as an antidote to the extractive, mechanistic approach of industrial agriculture. But beneath this noble vision lies a fundamental paradox: is regenerative agriculture truly a way of surrendering to nature’s intelligence, or is it simply a more refined method of human intervention?

At its core, agriculture is an act of control. The very notion of cultivating land implies selecting, managing, and influencing natural processes to serve human purposes. If regenerative agriculture seeks to restore nature’s balance, does that mean it is undoing human interference, or is it simply reshaping it into a more sustainable form?

This article explores the philosophical underpinnings of regenerative agriculture—its relationship with control, chaos, and the deeper human quest for harmony with the earth.

The Myth of Letting Nature Take Its Course

The idea that regenerative agriculture is a “return to nature” suggests that nature, left alone, would regenerate on its own. This assumption raises a crucial question: what is “nature,” and what does it mean to return to it?

In the wild, ecosystems do not exist in a static state of balance but are constantly evolving through cycles of growth, decay, competition, and renewal. Left entirely untouched, a degraded landscape does not necessarily regenerate in a way that aligns with human agricultural needs. A barren, overgrazed field might not return to lush fertility within a human lifetime.

Regenerative agriculture, then, is not a passive act of stepping back but a guided process—one that involves soil amendments, rotational grazing, cover cropping, and other intentional interventions. While these methods mimic natural cycles, they are ultimately human-designed. This raises the question: can we truly “let nature take its course” while simultaneously managing its direction?

Control vs. Harmony: A Taoist Perspective

In Western philosophy, humans have long seen themselves as separate from nature—either as its masters (as in the biblical idea of dominion over the earth) or as its stewards, responsible for its care. But Eastern thought, particularly Taoism, offers a different perspective.

Taoism emphasizes wu wei, a concept often translated as “effortless action” or “non-interference.” It suggests that the best way to engage with the world is not through force or control, but through alignment with the natural flow of things.

Regenerative agriculture, at its best, embodies this principle. Instead of fighting against natural systems (as industrial agriculture does with pesticides and chemical fertilizers), it seeks to work with them—building soil health, fostering biodiversity, and creating self-sustaining cycles of fertility.

But even this approach involves an inherent contradiction: if we are designing a system that mimics nature, are we still imposing human will upon it? A wild forest grows according to its own logic, while a food forest—despite being diverse and self-sustaining—is ultimately a human-designed ecosystem. At what point does guidance become control?

Ethical Questions: Healing or Hubris?

If regenerative agriculture is a form of intervention, does that make it an act of wisdom or arrogance?

Some environmental thinkers argue that nature does not need our help. They advocate for “rewilding” projects, where human impact is minimized, allowing ecosystems to recover without interference. From this perspective, even regenerative agriculture can be seen as an act of human hubris—assuming we know best how to “fix” the land.

However, others argue that we have already altered the earth too profoundly to withdraw completely. There is no pristine, untouched nature left. Human activity—whether deforestation, soil degradation, or climate change—has reshaped ecosystems in ways that demand active restoration. In this view, regenerative agriculture is not an imposition on nature, but a responsibility—a way of healing the wounds we have inflicted.

This tension mirrors the broader philosophical debate between anthropocentrism (the belief that humans have the right to shape the world for their needs) and ecocentrism (the belief that nature has intrinsic value beyond human use). Can regenerative agriculture exist without centering human needs, or is it always, ultimately, about creating a system that benefits us?

A Dance, Not a Battle

Perhaps the answer lies not in choosing between control and surrender, but in redefining our relationship with the land. The philosopher Martin Buber spoke of two ways of relating to the world: “I-It” (seeing nature as a resource to be used) and “I-Thou” (engaging with nature as a living presence, worthy of respect).

Regenerative agriculture, at its highest expression, moves toward an I-Thou relationship with the land. It is not about domination, nor is it about passive withdrawal. It is about participation—observing, responding, and adapting in a way that neither imposes nor retreats entirely.

Alan Watts once described life as a dance rather than a battle. In a dance, neither partner seeks to dominate the other; instead, they move in response to each other’s rhythms. Perhaps this is the true spirit of regenerative agriculture—not as a rigid system, nor as a hands-off approach, but as an ongoing dialogue with the earth.

So, as we cultivate the soil, are we regenerating nature, or are we still shaping it in our own image? The answer may not lie in the land itself, but in the mindset with which we approach it.

By Tendai L Sachiti

19/01/2025

Are Our Corporates Cooperating?
By Tendai L Sachiti

In the age of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and greenwashing, the question remains: are corporations genuinely committed to sustainability, or are they merely masking business-as-usual practices behind a veil of eco-friendly rhetoric? For those of us championing regenerative agriculture, this question becomes even more critical as we consider the urgent need for meaningful action to address the twin crises of environmental degradation and food insecurity.

The Corporate Mirage of Sustainability

Despite lofty promises to reduce carbon footprints, promote sustainable practices, and support farmers, many corporations continue to exploit conventional agricultural systems that prioritize profit over people and planet. Industrial farming practices, fueled by these corporations, are responsible for nearly 30% of global greenhouse gas emissions, according to a report by the United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO). These methods degrade soil health, pollute water systems, and strip away biodiversity, leaving a toxic legacy for future generations.

Corporations often tout their support for sustainable farming initiatives, but a closer look reveals a troubling reality: their definition of "sustainable" often excludes regenerative practices. Instead, they push monocultures, synthetic fertilizers, and genetically modified crops, creating a vicious cycle of dependency for farmers.

The Case for Regenerative Agriculture

Regenerative agriculture, on the other hand, offers a proven pathway to restore ecosystems, increase crop yields, and improve food quality. Research from the Rodale Institute highlights that regenerative farming systems outperform conventional systems in terms of yield resilience, particularly during extreme weather events. In drought years, regenerative systems can yield up to 78% more than their conventional counterparts.

Moreover, the health benefits of regenerative practices extend beyond the farm. A study published in Frontiers in Nutrition shows that crops grown using regenerative methods have higher nutrient densities, offering consumers food that is not only free from harmful chemicals but also richer in vitamins and minerals.

How Corporates Are Undermining Regenerative Agriculture

Despite these advantages, many corporations are reluctant to embrace regenerative agriculture on a large scale. The reasons are clear:

1. Profit-Driven Models: Regenerative farming disrupts the dependency on synthetic inputs, cutting into the profits of agrochemical giants.

2. Resistance to Change: Transitioning to regenerative practices requires investment and long-term commitment, which conflict with the short-term profit goals of most corporations.

3. Lack of Farmer Support: Instead of empowering farmers with training and resources for regenerative practices, corporations often lock them into exploitative contracts that prioritize volume over value.

A 2022 report by the Environmental Working Group revealed that only 5% of corporate funding in agricultural sustainability initiatives goes toward practices that align with regenerative principles. The rest is funneled into maintaining the status quo, disguised as incremental "sustainability."

The Role of Farmers and Consumers

Change does not rest solely on corporations. Farmers and consumers must unite to demand accountability and transparency. Farmers can adopt regenerative practices independently or through cooperatives, while consumers can support local, regenerative farms and advocate for policies that promote sustainable food systems.

A Call for Accountability

If corporations are serious about sustainability, they must prove it by:

Redirecting subsidies and funding to regenerative agriculture.

Training farmers in regenerative techniques.

Prioritizing soil health, biodiversity, and carbon sequestration in their supply chains.

Until then, their claims of sustainability will remain hollow.

Let’s Discuss

What are your thoughts? Are corporations truly committed to supporting regenerative agriculture, or are they part of the problem? How can farmers and consumers hold them accountable? Share your experiences and ideas—together, we can push for a future where agriculture heals the planet instead of harming it.

Farmers secrets

26/07/2025

14/07/2025

29/04/2025

22/04/2025

19/03/2025

12/03/2025

19/01/2025

Address

Website

Alerts

Contact The Business

Shortcuts

Share