12/31/2025
Dominance Theory has been thoroughly disproven
Dominance and submission as descriptors for interaction amongst group members are still valid
Saying this because I routinely see claims that “dominance isn’t real.” It is real. In ethology dominance is defined as “individual's preferential access to resources over another.” How that applies to different species varies
Dominance Theory, is essentially Game of Thrones for dogs. While exact principles vary somewhat, the core concept is that dogs live in strictly ranked packs ruled by one alpha, and all dogs aspire to be that alpha. Alphadom is achieved and retained through the use of force and control of resources. The quest to be alpha transcends species lines, therefore you must establish yourself as alpha immediately and constantly work to retain that position for the life of your dog (and also make sure he doesn’t try to become alpha over your kids, cat, chickens, and so forth). All behavioral problems stem from attempts to obtain rank
That’s bu****it. And you get all sorts of weird stuff from it, like never allowing your dog to walk through a door unless you go through it first. Or the belief that your dog is “dominating” stuffed toys. Or the existance of Andrew Tate
Dogs DO have social structure, and it does include dominance and submission, but it’s also very fluid. And they are very well aware we are not dogs. A dog may retain control of some resources and simply not care about others, or keep access to a resource one day and just not care about it the next. They might find some individuals worth challenging and others not. Some dogs may be more likely to always stand their gound and others may almost always yield. In an ideal scenario, all this is established without aggression, or with only ritualized aggression and posturing. There is a TON that has been written about this and it’s really not possible to do it justice in on social media post. But yes, Dominance Theory is bunk. Dominance the ethological concept is not