17/04/2025
[Hong Kong Missing Cat Incident : Volunteer Refused to Return Cat]
《荃灣屋苑走失貓事件 —— 義工拒還貓 最終篇》
約兩星期前,有網上帖文指一隻豹貓被遺棄於電梯,後被送往某貓場,惟該處「義工」堅拒歸還。今日我全程參與事件處理,因群組有人認識貓主,而我亦曾協助過類似案件。確認後發現貓主非繁殖者,亦無誣蔑對方情況,才決定以私人身份義務協助。
到達元朗後,發現 .io 和 亦有到場。我主要負責:
1. 以觀察貓紋和樣子協助核實貓隻身份;
2. 以「小清律師B太太」身份擔任公證人,試圖與義工溝通。
事件其實非常簡單,貓主有針卡、地址證明,願意自費做DNA。若對方願意理性處理,根本無需勞動警方與浪費公帑。
可惜,現場環境極劣(偏遠村落如貨櫃場),等候一小時期間被蚊叮咬。義工現身時態度傲慢,主人一開口便被回嗆「報警吧!」對方拒絕溝通,即使我表明身份亦遭無視。只好報警。
警察到場後敲門無人應門,最終用警棍才得以進入,並要求義工與貓主一同前往另一地點核實身份。我們只能憑貓主共享的定位追蹤,穿越山路才抵達,貓隻當時已準備交接。
感謝警方協助,但這一切本可避免。交接地點環境如沙漠,高溫33度,滿地沙塵,令人擔心貓的健康。該貓場內部狀況如何,我們不得而知。(附圖為現場)
雖貓最終被歸還。貓主終可接回愛貓,回家團聚。
整件事明明有證據,卻被劣質義工強行阻撓,令人氣憤。特別指出以下幾點:
1. 義工聲稱會將貓交漁護署處理;
2. 被問如何處理有主貓時,竟稱「未處理過」;
3. 證據充足仍拒還貓,須勞動警方;
4. 現場惡劣環境,令人難忘;
5. 貓翌日即被改名並發起眾籌;
6. 主人證明身分後仍遭誣衊為繁殖者;
7. 主人個資被公開,或涉刑責。
希望大家日後捐款前看清楚人與機構,善心值得用在對的人身上。
想了解整個救貓過程及某機構的誤導言論,可觀看影片: https://youtu.be/3m3pkCke9Tw
Two weeks ago, a Bengal cat was wrongly assumed abandoned and taken by a shelter volunteer, who later refused to return it to the rightful owner — despite clear evidence, vet records, and proof of address.
Today I joined the owner to help mediate, alongside .io and . Unfortunately, the “volunteer” was arrogant, refused communication, and told us to “call the police” outright.
Police were called, and after a long wait in harsh conditions, the cat was finally returned — but only after officers forced entry and escorted both parties for identity verification.
Key concerns:
Volunteer planned to hand cat to AFCD
Lied about procedures & experience
Used the cat for online crowdfunding the next day
Accused owner of being a breeder without evidence
Publicly doxxed the owner
This case wasted public resources and caused unnecessary distress — all due to a so-called volunteer abusing their position.
Kindness is precious — but make sure it goes to the right people.
Full rescue footage & details here:
https://youtu.be/3m3pkCke9Tw
#貓義工 #走失貓 #愛豹仕家族 #香港孟加拉豹貓 #豹貓 #孟加拉豹貓 #知豹咩料啦 #金豹 #銀豹 #雪豹 #喵星人 #貓之日常 #香港貓奴