Wellswood Walkies

20/08/2025

19/08/2025

In Sweden, dogs are treated like family by law. Leaving them alone for over six hours is illegal, recognizing that dogs feel time and suffer emotionally when isolated. Studies show they can experience anxiety, tremble, or wait by the door. It’s a powerful reminder: love, presence, and routine aren’t extras; they’re essential, even when you're away.

📸📝©️Watercooler

15/08/2025

14/08/2025

09/08/2025

"Is he friendly?"
I get asked this sometimes when I’m out walking Murphy.

Yes, he is friendly… but that doesn’t mean it’s an open invitation for him to be greeted or to play.

Murphy doesn’t enjoy being rushed up to or bounced on by other dogs. He likes to have space and time to choose if he wants to say hello and most of the time, he’d rather not.

It’s a bit like us. We might smile in a friendly way, say “hi” in a friendly manner and even stop for a friendly chat, but we wouldn’t feel comfortable if a stranger suddenly ran up to us or hugged us in the middle of the street. Most of us would find that uncomfortable.

So what does “friendly” mean? Is it that we’re friendly every day, to everyone, in every mood? Or does it depend on how we’re feeling, who we’re with and what we think “friendly” looks like? A version of our friendly might not match someone else’s

When Murphy sees another dog, he usually walks in a curve and carries on with his own day. If it’s a familiar face, he might approach with a little excitement, share a quick sniff, then move on. He’s not interested in playing, he’s happy just being in the same space.

Like people, dogs have their own preferences. They don’t want or need to interact with everyone they see. Even friendly dogs don’t always want to play or be approached by others.

So yes, Murphy is friendly. But that doesn’t mean he wants to say hello to every dog or person we meet. That’s just who he is. 🙂🐾

30/07/2025

Sharing space

Navigating the world means constantly making choices about space, where to go, how close to stand, sit, to engage or pass by around others.

Most of us do this without even thinking, adjusting our paths to avoid brushing past others , choosing where to sit or stepping aside on a narrow path.

We all have preferences around how much space we need, this might depend where we are and how we feel, also who we’re sharing space with, people we know well, we might stop for a chat, share a hug, or sit close by. But around strangers we might smile as we walk by, share a good morning or just carry on with our day.

Not every dog wants close interaction with every person, dog or other animal they see. They might not feel comfortable interacting with or being approached by unknown people or other dogs. They may need their own space, space to eat, sleep and rest at home without being disturbed. They may need space without walking close by another dog, person and or other animals.

Some dogs need more space to move freely, providing a wide curve gently to create distance or more space to just watch.

Keeping dogs on lead around other animals or when we see other dogs on lead, really helps to manage potentially situations that might arise, respecting the shared space, making sure everyone stays safe to enjoy the outdoors.

Creating space isn’t about avoiding the world, it’s supporting our dogs and others to feel safe, it isn’t just about what we’re comfortable with. It’s about listening to what our dogs are telling us too.

29/07/2025

PLEASE RECONSIDER GROOMING YOUR DOG WHILST OUT ON WALKS (or in the garden!)

This - along with letting them swim in waterways - could be killing wildlife.


It's that time of year when you see random distributions of dog fluff out on walks.

Kanita is also blowing her coat, and Mohawk has been having a big coat change too recently. There's something very satisfying about gently pulling those loose tufts of hair out. If you know, you know.


I don't blame people for thinking that it's easier to groom a super floofy dog outside to save covering their house in hair- BUT if that dog receives anti-parasitic treatment, this may be harming wildlife.

A study in the Netherlands detected two active substances used in routine pet anti-parasitic treatments in the nests of great t**s- who had collected hair in order to build their nests.

Another study by The University of Sussex found that screened nests contained 17 out of 20 insecticides screened for. 100% of nests contained fipronil and 89% contained imidacloprid.
A higher number of unhatched eggs and dead chicks were associated with higher numbers of chemicals present in the nests (with dog hair being used to build the nests by the birds).


Many of these chemicals in these treatments are thought to be harmful to birds. It is also thought that they are damaging to insect populations (including bees) as well as contributing to pollution of waterways and damaging aquatic ecosystems - contributed by people letting their dogs swim in ponds, lakes, streams, rivers etc.


If you routinely use parasite control medication on your dog please do not let them swim outdoors (especially soon after treatment) and avoid grooming them outside (or bag up the hair as you groom).

There are some suggestions that oral medications are less damaging, but they don't just sit in the digestive system. They are transported around the bloodstream- which supplies nutrients and oxygen to the whole body. Toxins leave the body via excrement, urine, sweat, hair and skin cells- albeit predominantly via the former two.

Whilst topical treatments pose a greater risk - especially soon after treatment- it cannot be assumed that there is no negative affect from oral treatments. The research identified that dog hair is linked to bird deaths and that specifically states that dogs owned by volunteers donating nests received parasite control via collars, spot on and tablets.
Chemicals from Nexguard and Bravecto were not screened for in the study and thus are not ruled out as safe nor established as harmful (to birds).


The recommended frequency of use of these products continues to be called into question, as is the risk of adverse side effects in pets!

Veternarians are being encouraged to prescribe them based on risk to the individual.
Assessing individual risk is not easy for veternarians to do in the time that they have, so you can help your vet help you by intensively reading information on these products rather than administering them every 1-3 months in blind faith that it's the right thing to do and without consequence.

Our wildlife is in decline and if we care about nature- we all need to do our bit.

That may include reviewing the specific medication you purchase from your vet or you may decide to use them less frequently, such as treating as needed or seasonally (instead of across the year).
You may delay letting your dog swim post treatment for as long as possible, or consider alternative prevention such as worm counts, flea combing or natural repellents (although do note, some ingredients in these could still be toxic to some species of wildlife).


Again, whether to treat or not should be down to INDIVIDUAL RISK. What poses a risk to individuals in one area may differ to others elsewhere.

But it's also your personal choice and I want to make it clear that this post is NOT telling people to NOT treat their pets but simply to be aware of the potential impact of such treatments and to adjust our habits (swimming, grooming outside) accordingly.


Are there other things that damage the environment? Of course.
But this is a page about dogs, so content will be relevant to dogs.

You can use the fact that XY and Z also harm the environment as a justification for doing nothing, or you can consider whether there are small changes you are able to make. The cumulative effect is what causes these issues to escalate, and thus the cumulative effect is also capable of making some positive change.


Note: If you don’t use anti parasitics on your dog & groom them outside, then the hair may be beneficial for the birds. However, do consider that grooming products and other medications may pose a risk - should you use these.

These were the resources linked into the comments, but Ive opted to bring them here for ease. Within some of these you can be linked to the research on this topic and you will find much more detail on this emotive topic.

https://www.sussex.ac.uk/broadcast/read/66973

https://www.veterinaryirelandjournal.com/small-animal/359-cat-and-dog-parasiticides-and-the-environment

https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0048969725000737?ref=pdf_download&fr=RR-2&rr=908a988c1c6d63c1

https://www.songbird-survival.org.uk/post/veterinary-drugs-found-in-bird-nests/

https://www.imperial.ac.uk/news/243875/toxic-flea-tick-treatments-polluting-uk/

https://www.pan-uk.org/garden-birds-are-being-poisoned-by-pet-flea-treatments/

https://www.broads-authority.gov.uk/looking-after/managing-land-and-water/water-quality/flea-treatments-and-their-impact-on-water-quality

https://www.kentwildlifetrust.org.uk/blog/flea-treatment-toxic-to-wildlife

https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2025/feb/23/flea-treatments-cats-dogs-environmental-hazard

https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7738705/

https://www.bva.co.uk/take-action/our-policies/responsible-use-of-parasiticides-for-cats-and-dogs/

https://www.bsava.com/position-statement/parasite-control/