MANSFIELD DOG TRAINING

MANSFIELD DOG TRAINING We provide training for dogs and their owners abiding by the code of practice set out by the APDT.

We promote training methods primarily through the use of positive reinforcement. Visit www.mansfielddogtraining.co.uk for class / 1-2-1 information We promote force free training primarily through the use of positive reinforcement. Visit www.mansfielddogtraining.co.uk for class / 1-2-1 information. Classes also available through our sister site www.nottinghamdogtrainer.co.uk

Well said, the Mutty Professor.https://www.facebook.com/share/183j1znFno/
13/02/2026

Well said, the Mutty Professor.

https://www.facebook.com/share/183j1znFno/

A professional is asked about what’s causing the rise in dog bites. They’re given the opportunity to educate the public on a big media platform on how to prevent their dog biting.

They don’t….

❌ Mention unethical breeding practises. That owners should get a dog from a breeder who considers the health and temperament of both parents, who proactively socialises any litters they bring into the world as well as pairing puppies with suitable homes.

❌ Mention the rise in ‘power’ and working breeds due to the influence of breeds frequently featuring in dog training social media videos, and how more and more people are getting a breed of dog who is beyond their current capabilities. All because they like and have been sold the idea of controlling such a powerful dog via social media.

❌ Discuss that an increase in dog population parallel to a busier world where people have less time (to train, walk and BE with their dog) will by default increase the risk of incidents.

❌ Describe how it’s important to systematically increase a puppy or dog’s experiences parallel to helping them develop coping strategies and confidence in navigating what is an ever increasing challenging world.

❌ Meeting the physical, social and mental stimulation needs of the dog as an individual, ensuring training takes into consideration what life skills the dog may need to live a fulfilled life safely.

❌ Being someone who your dog wants to listen to, not because they fear you, but because you are a calm, consistent communicator who helps them try to succeed in this complicated word.

❌ Being someone who listens to their dog by learning to understand (in the moment) canine body language, so you can be better able to respond to situations and help your dog not escalate their behaviour.

❌ Discuss how more dogs than ever are struggling with muscular skeletal issues, skin disease and gastro intestinal issues that could be the cause or maintaining factor in their aggression (and link this back to responsible breeding but also why it’s important to get a health check for any dog with behaviour problems!).

❌ Describe the rise in popularity in dog training as a profession resulting in trainers (using any method of dog training) taking on extreme cases without adequate practical experience or knowledge (including qualifications) on dog behaviour.

❌ Acknowledge the overwhelming amount of information on social media and online that can lead to owners hop skotching from one method or approach to another, often trying to bypass professional support.

A missed opportunity to highlight that growling, barking, lunging and biting are behaviours symptomatic of an underlying feeling that is often motivated or influenced by health problems, stress, historic or current negative experiences, as well as the relationship and interactions we have with our dogs.

What they do with that opportunity instead is…

✅ Refer to the force free ‘movement’ - a supposedly new 'movement' that's been around since the 80s- as ‘woke’ and largely responsible for the increase in dog bites.

✅ Prioritise the need to correct dogs with behaviour problems instead of (or before) understanding and supporting them by identifying why they are aggressive in the first place.

So focused on defending and advocating their preferred method of training, they used the platform to target those who do different and sensationally misrepresented and insulted them (or tried to).

Thank goodness the wonderful Ann BD had a larger section on this feature to bring some less emotive and more intelligent points into the discussion.

In a world where the number of followers can be mistaken for expertise…. I encourage everyone to follow professionals who demonstrate a deep understanding of behaviour and who showcase their process AND long term results.

Clients/owners walking/training/enjoying their relaxed and happy dogs - ideally months after their session- is my criteria for longterm success.

Please be cautious of those who struggle to communicate diplomatically and thoroughly, resorting to labels, name calling, insults and making sweeping generalised statements without acknowledging a single nuance of what is almost always a very complicated thing.

Professional conduct is waning within this industry and that need not be the case regardless of our stance on opposing methods of training.

Note- whilst it's not overly difficult to learn the identity of this professional, this post reflects on a broader issue within our industry. I acknowledge that this post cuts VERY close to my 'no name and shame' rule, but I will delete any naming of the individual in question.

https://www.facebook.com/share/1C6tmND1D4/
30/01/2026

https://www.facebook.com/share/1C6tmND1D4/

What We Owe Dogs and Families in Bite Cases

Bite cases are never just about behavior.
They involve safety, trust, liability, grief, and long-term consequences for everyone involved.

As professionals, certainty can feel comforting, but it can also close the door to better questions and better outcomes.

Ethical work means slowing down, resisting oversimplification, and holding space for complexity, even when answers are uncomfortable.

Panorama. Vet fees.https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1G3zhrYJPD/
12/01/2026

Panorama. Vet fees.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1G3zhrYJPD/

We interrupt this series to bring you something more important....

As an RVN, here’s what Panorama got wrong about vet fees, and why it matters

The recent Panorama programme on veterinary fees touched on something real. Rising costs. Owners under pressure. Decisions made when people are scared and overwhelmed. That part matters and it deserves to be acknowledged.

What didn’t land so well was how complex the situation actually is.

Veterinary care hasn’t become more expensive because the people doing the work have changed. It’s become more advanced, more regulated and more accountable. Anaesthesia, pain relief, infection control, diagnostics and monitoring have all moved on. That has improved welfare and outcomes. It also comes with a cost. The scope of possibilities has risen.

The days of James Herriot, "cutting a dog on a kitchen table" with minimal anaesthesia and little regulation, are gone. Yes, that is the reality, and I'm horrified to think how many animals knew pain simply because we didn't know better.

Regulation has moved on a long way, and so has our understanding of animal welfare. That isn’t excess. It’s progress.
Offering diagnostic and treatment options isn’t “upselling'. It’s informed consent. The very thing the Competition and Markets Authority has asked for. The programme failed to mention that the carers of hospitalised dogs were given updates daily, including costs. Owners always retain choice, but those choices are often made in moments of fear and distress. That reality didn’t feature much. Critical medicine doesn't often wait; unfortunately, I really wish it did.

There was a strong focus on comparing private practice fees with those charged by a charity. The difference in cost was obvious. What wasn’t explained was why. Charity care isn’t cheaper because it’s worth less. It’s subsidised. The shortfall is covered by donations, fundraising, grants, limited services, strict eligibility criteria, and staff working under huge pressure, often for lower pay. Showing those figures side by side without that context gives a skewed picture of what veterinary care actually costs, and who absorbs the difference.

Something else stood out to me. Registered Veterinary Nurses were interviewed for the programme. Their perspectives didn’t make the final cut. The irony of that hasn’t been lost on many of us. It mirrors what happens in practice far too often. RVNs are central to patient care, yet our voices are frequently missing from public conversations about the profession.

There’s also an assumption that sits quietly under discussions like this, that higher income means greater responsibility or compassion. In my experience across private practice, charity work, referral and rescue, that simply isn’t true. I’ve seen owners with very little do everything they can for their animals. I’ve also seen animals from high-income households presented late and without basic care, because cost was assumed not to be an issue, until it was. Money doesn't always buy manners, morals or ethics and some of those in areas of financial privilege, didn't value their pets in any way that could be truly compared. To them, they were possessions. Replaceable. And that is painful to witness.

Compassion isn’t about income or postcode. It’s about education, preparation and realistic expectations. Pet ownership has been normalised without enough honest discussion about long term responsibility, cost and welfare.

This conversation is important. But it needs nuance, balance and honesty. Not selective framing. Not blame. And not the quiet erasure of the people doing the work every day.

There are, unfortunately, too many people like this in the world.https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1QGFGHC1iS/
02/01/2026

There are, unfortunately, too many people like this in the world.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1QGFGHC1iS/

I didn’t know how much rage I was holding back until I saw a stranger’s hand reaching for my dog, and I realized—with terrifying clarity—that I was ready to bite him myself.

We were sitting on the patio of The Daily Grind, a generic, overpriced coffee shop that had popped up in my neighborhood during the last wave of gentrification. It was one of those crisp, bright Tuesday mornings that feel aggressive in their cheerfulness.

Under the metal table, Babel was doing his best to become invisible.

Babel isn’t the kind of dog you see on dog food commercials. He’s a Greyhound mix, likely crossed with something wiry and ancient like a Saluki. He is all elbows, ribcage, and nervous energy. I adopted him two years ago from a hoarding situation in rural Ohio. He doesn’t understand toys, he flinches at the sound of a dropped spoon, and his eyes—large, liquid, and perpetually worried—seem to hold the weight of a thousand disappointments.

Babel is a creature of boundaries in a world that hates them.

I was sipping my oat milk latte, scrolling through the news on my phone. The headlines were the usual American cocktail of anxiety: debates over who controls whose body, billionaires building bunkers while the housing market imploded, and Op-Eds about why my generation is too sensitive. I felt that low-level hum of exhaustion that everyone I know seems to live with lately. The feeling that we are all just commodities, waiting to be consumed.

Then, a shadow fell over the table.

"Well, aren't you a unique looking thing?"

The voice was loud, projecting the kind of unearned confidence that usually comes with a tax bracket I’ll never reach. I looked up. Standing there was a man in his fifties, wearing a polo shirt tucked into khakis and expensive loafers. He had a smile that didn't reach his eyes—a smile that felt less like an expression of joy and more like a demand for compliance.

Babel shifted against my shin. I felt his muscles tense, turning hard as wire. He tucked his long, needle-nose snout under his paws. The universal sign for: Please, I am not here.

"He’s a rescue," I said, offering the polite, tight-lipped smile I’ve been trained to wear since kindergarten. "He’s very anxious. We’re just working on exposure therapy today."

It was a clear dismissal. A boundary drawn in the sand.

The man didn’t even look at me. His eyes were locked on Babel. "Nonsense," he boomed, stepping closer. "Dogs know good people. Animals love me. My brother has a Golden Retriever, loves to wrestle."

"He’s not a Golden Retriever," I said, my voice hardening slightly. "He’s scared. Please give him space."

The man chuckled. It was a patronizing sound, wet and heavy. "You’re projecting, sweetheart. You’re making him nervous with all that negative energy. He just needs a firm hand and a friendly scratch."

He began to bend down.

In that slowed-down moment, a thousand memories fired in my synapses. I remembered the uncle who demanded hugs at Thanksgiving even when I pulled away. I remembered the boss who rested his hand on my shoulder while critiquing my spreadsheets, telling me to "relax" when I stiffened. I remembered the way politicians discussed healthcare, talking over the people actually living in the bodies they were legislating.

I realized it wasn’t about the dog. It’s never just about the dog. It was about Entitlement. The belief that if something is in public—a woman, a child, an animal, a park—it belongs to the public. It belongs to him because he wants it.

"Sir, do not touch my dog," I said. This time, I didn't smile.

He paused, looking at me with genuine annoyance. "You don't have to be a bitch about it. I'm just being friendly. It’s a compliment."

It’s a compliment. The catchphrase of the boundary-crosser.

"He doesn't want your compliment," I said, my heart hammering against my ribs. "He wants to be left alone."

"He’s a dog," the man scoffed. "He doesn't know what he wants."

And then, he did it. He ignored my voice. He ignored Babel’s trembling ribs. He ignored the whale-eye Babel was giving him—the whites of his eyes showing in sheer terror. The man reached out his fleshy, broad hand to pat Babel’s head, claiming his right to touch.

Babel didn't bite. He didn't attack.

He snapped.

It was an air-snap, a loud CLACK of teeth inches from the man's fingers, accompanied by a guttural, vibrating growl that came from the depths of his survival instinct. It was the sound of a creature who had been cornered and had no words left.

The man je**ed back as if he’d been shot. He stumbled, knocking into an empty chair.

"Jesus!" he shouted, his face turning a mottled red. "That thing is vicious! He almost bit me!"

The coffee shop went silent. Heads turned. I saw the judgment in their eyes—the fear of the 'unpredictable animal.'

"You need to muzzle that beast!" the man yelled, his embarrassment curdling into aggression. "If you can't control your animal, you shouldn't have him in public. I could sue you! I could have him put down!"

I stood up. My legs were shaking, not from fear, but from the adrenaline dump of a lifetime. I looked at Babel. He was cowering now, pressing himself into the concrete, waiting for the punishment he thought he deserved for protecting himself.

I looked at the man. And I saw him for what he was: a bully who was used to the world bending to his whims, shocked that a frightened animal hadn't read the script.

"He didn't bite you," I said, my voice surprisingly steady, carrying across the silent patio. "He told you 'No' in the only language he speaks. And he only did that because you refused to listen to me when I told you 'No' in English."

The man sputtered. "He—he’s aggressive."

"He is not aggressive," I stepped between him and Babel. "He is autonomous. He is a living being with feelings and fears, and he is not here for your entertainment. He is not public property."

I looked around the patio, meeting the eyes of the onlookers. A young woman with a laptop gave me a tiny, imperceptible nod. An older lady frowned, but she was listening.

I turned back to the man. "You felt entitled to touch him. You prioritized your desire to feel like a 'good guy' over his feeling of safety. And now that he’s set a boundary, you’re playing the victim. It’s a classic move. But it’s not going to work today."

"You're crazy," the man muttered, adjusting his polo shirt, unable to hold my gaze. "Another hysterical liberal woman with a dangerous cur."

"And you," I said, dropping my voice so only he could hear, "are the reason women choose the bear."

He opened his mouth, closed it, and then turned on his heel. He stormed off toward his oversized SUV, muttering about how the neighborhood had gone to hell.

I sat back down. My hands were trembling as I reached under the table. Babel looked up at me, his ears flat, expecting a scolding.

"It's okay, buddy," I whispered, stroking the velvet fur behind his ears. "You’re a good boy. You’re a very good boy."

He let out a long, shuddering breath and rested his head on my knee.

I looked at my cold latte. I thought about how many times I had stayed silent to keep the peace. I thought about how many times I had let people touch my hair, or interrupt me, or explain my own job to me, just to avoid being called "difficult" or "crazy."

Babel hadn’t worried about being called crazy. He cared about being safe.

We sat there for another twenty minutes. I didn't leave immediately. I wouldn't let that man chase us out of our space. When we finally got up to leave, the young woman with the laptop looked up.

"He's a beautiful dog," she said softly.

"Thank you," I replied. "He's very selective about his friends."

"Good for him," she said. "We all should be."

As we walked home, the city noise seemed a little less oppressive. Babel trotted beside me, his head held a little higher. He had defended his space, and the sky hadn't fallen.

The lesson wasn't just for the man in the suit. It was for me. It was for anyone who has been told that their discomfort is less important than someone else's ego.

Consent isn't just a legal term. It’s a culture. And if a nervous Greyhound mix can demand it against a world that wants to consume him, then maybe, just maybe, I can too.

A 'No' is a complete sentence. It doesn't require a smile, an apology, or an explanation to be valid. Whether it comes from a woman, a child, or a dog—listen to it the first time.

Human reaction to their dogs behaviour? Less is best.https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BzqoVGB6V/
19/12/2025

Human reaction to their dogs behaviour? Less is best.

https://www.facebook.com/share/p/1BzqoVGB6V/

A dog with two tales - Proactive and Reactionary Dog Ownership!

One of the most common places where problems begin in dog ownership isn’t the dog — it’s the timing of the human response.

Many owners find themselves being reactionary to their dog’s behaviour. And to be clear, that doesn’t make them bad owners. It makes them normal. Dogs don’t come with warning labels, adolescence arrives unannounced, and life has a habit of throwing situations at us where we have to respond in real time and do the best we can with the information we have.

Sometimes, being reactionary is unavoidable. Something happens, your dog does something unexpected, and you deal with it in the moment. That’s just reality.

The trouble starts when reactionary ownership becomes the default setting rather than the exception.

Reactionary ownership usually means the behaviour has already happened. Often it’s been rehearsed. Sometimes it’s been quietly building for weeks, months, or through a developmental phase, and the owner is now responding on the fly. Stress levels rise, clarity drops, and suddenly everything feels like a problem that needs fixing right now.

This is usually the point where people ask me questions like:
How do I deal with my puppy in a fear period?
What do I do about my adolescent dog who’s being wildly over-zealous around other dogs?
How do I handle arousal in my sports dog?
What do I do when my obedience dog makes a mistake in competition?

They’re good questions. Normal questions. But they’re also often asked from a place of panic rather than perspective.

One of the most helpful frameworks I give people is what I call the rule of three. It’s simple, but it stops you from accidentally creating a behavioural problem where one doesn’t yet exist.

The first time your dog does something you don’t like — whether that’s in daily life or in training — do absolutely nothing. Make a mental note and move on. Dogs are allowed to make mistakes. Developmental phases exist. One-off behaviours don’t define a dog or a training program.

If it happens a second time, then you start to pay attention. You consider possible causes. Is this developmental? Is the dog tired, over-aroused, under-skilled, or confused? Can you prevent it from being rehearsed again? If it’s a training issue, this is your cue to quietly go back to foundations and check the steps you originally taught. If it’s a behavioural challenge, you simply avoid putting the dog in situations where they can keep practising the unwanted response.

If it happens a third time, now it’s time to be intentional. This is where proactive ownership steps in. You don’t panic, but you also don’t hope it resolves itself. You make a clear, strategic plan to address the issue before it grows legs and runs off into the distance.

At the moment, one of my own dogs is deep in the glorious chaos of adolescence. She’s ten months old and, frankly, being an absolute brat. Her recall has apparently been cancelled. She’s hyper-aroused, demanding, opinionated, and doing all the things that make adolescent dogs so deeply lovable and profoundly irritating at the same time.

But here’s the important part: I know this phase will pass.

This behaviour isn’t a training failure. It’s a developmental wobble that currently exceeds her capacity to regulate herself. Going head-to-head with that isn’t productive. Instead, I’m very deliberately choosing what not to train right now.

A huge part of proactive ownership is understanding when to manage, when to ignore, and when to train against an issue.

Management simply means I’m not putting her in situations where she can rehearse behaviour I don’t want. If her recall is unreliable, she doesn’t get freedom to practise blowing me off. She’s walked in places where the environment is predictable, or she’s on a long line so I always have a safety net. That isn’t restrictive — it’s fair.

Ignoring is just as important, and far more under-used. Adolescents often start seeing ghosts. Random spooking. Sudden opinions about absolutely nothing. In those moments, I do nothing at all. I don’t label it, I don’t train it, and I don’t turn it into a “thing”. These behaviours are often washed in by development and disappear just as quietly if you let them. One of the most damaging mistakes owners make is implementing a behaviour plan for a problem that was going to resolve itself anyway.

Training against an issue is where proactive ownership really shines. If I know her recall is currently hit and miss, I’m not waiting for it to fail publicly. I’m revisiting foundations. I’m reinforcing success in controlled environments. I’m being intentional about building the dog I want rather than reacting to the dog she temporarily is.

She has a huge reinforcement history for recall. She’s been training since she was tiny. A short-term developmental wobble doesn’t erase that work, and it certainly doesn’t justify throwing pressure at her to “prove” she knows better.

This is the difference between reactionary and proactive dog ownership.

Reactionary ownership asks, How do I fix this now that it’s happening?
Proactive ownership asks, What dog am I intentionally creating over time?

One constantly chases problems.
The other quietly prevents them.

And when you choose proactive ownership, you stop fighting phases and start guiding dogs through them — which, in the long run, creates calmer households, stronger training foundations, and dogs who don’t need fixing in the first place.

Address

Mansfield
NG184LN

Website

http://www.nottinghamdogtrainer.co.uk/

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when MANSFIELD DOG TRAINING posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to MANSFIELD DOG TRAINING:

Share

Category