29/04/2025
Unfortunately, this deception happens here too. It’s all about the language. It can be so difficult to determine what methods a business uses, that even trainers spend time asking other trainers if they have any information about a particular service because they can’t tell by reading their website. In fact, if you can’t tell from the website for sure, that’s usually a big tell. - But then they might just outright lie about it.
Given that the UK are more advanced in terms of their animal welfare and legislation, I wouldn’t be surprised if it was worse here.
Be aware that what is written on the webpage or what is being told to you is not necessarily the service you are going to receive. There is very little regulation in the pet industry in Australia, it’s up to you to ask questions.
I was working at a park recently where another trainer was also working. They worked with 3 dogs over the course of the afternoon. All of them on e-collars.
The trainer's website states that they use positive reinforcement techniques and are committed to ethical training. There's no mention of e-collars or physical punishment anywhere. So an unsuspecting owner looking for a rewards based trainer would be forgiven for thinking this trainer might be a good fit for them.
If it's important to you to find a trainer who doesn't use physical punishment or force the ONLY way to to do that is to ask an explicit question and make sure you get a clear, unequivocal answer...
"𝘿𝙤 𝙮𝙤𝙪 𝙪𝙨𝙚 𝙩𝙤𝙤𝙡𝙨 𝙙𝙚𝙨𝙞𝙜𝙣𝙚𝙙 𝙩𝙤 𝙗𝙚 𝙖𝙫𝙚𝙧𝙨𝙞𝙫𝙚 𝙡𝙞𝙠𝙚 𝙨𝙡𝙞𝙥 𝙡𝙚𝙖𝙙𝙨, 𝙚𝙘𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙨, 𝙥𝙧𝙤𝙣𝙜 𝙘𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙨, 𝙜𝙧𝙤𝙩 𝙘𝙤𝙡𝙡𝙖𝙧𝙨, 𝙗𝙤𝙣𝙠𝙚𝙧𝙨?"
Don't rely on what a website or a page might say...they are marketing tools, remember. Always, always ask if it's important to you....even if you think you already know the answer. It's up to you to be an informed consumer and understand the product you're buying.
------------------------------------------
(𝘍𝘰𝘳 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘢𝘷𝘰𝘪𝘥𝘢𝘯𝘤𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘥𝘰𝘶𝘣𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘪𝘴 𝘪𝘴𝘯'𝘵 𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦 𝘶𝘴𝘦 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘵𝘰𝘰𝘭𝘴. 𝘐𝘵'𝘴 𝘢 𝘱𝘰𝘴𝘵 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘤𝘭𝘢𝘳𝘪𝘵𝘺. 𝘈𝘭𝘭 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳𝘴, 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘭𝘭 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯𝘴, 𝘰𝘸𝘦 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘵𝘩𝘢𝘵. 𝘈𝘯𝘥 𝘯𝘰 𝘵𝘳𝘢𝘪𝘯𝘦𝘳, 𝘰𝘧 𝘢𝘯𝘺 𝘱𝘦𝘳𝘴𝘶𝘢𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯, 𝘴𝘩𝘰𝘶𝘭𝘥 𝘰𝘣𝘫𝘦𝘤𝘵 𝘵𝘰 𝘱𝘳𝘰𝘴𝘱𝘦𝘤𝘵𝘪𝘷𝘦 𝘤𝘭𝘪𝘦𝘯𝘵𝘴 𝘢𝘴𝘬𝘪𝘯𝘨 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘮 𝘢𝘣𝘰𝘶𝘵 𝘵𝘩𝘦𝘪𝘳 𝘮𝘦𝘵𝘩𝘰𝘥𝘴)